Flexemes in theory and in practice

This paper provides an in-depth investigation of the possibility of systematically using flexemes - i.e., lexical units characterized in terms of form, as opposed to lexemes, characterized in terms of meaning - to model overabundance - i.e., the availability of more than one form in the same paradigm cell. The starting point is a preliminary evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of using flexemes to account for different overabundance phenomena, showing that flexemes are a good way to capture the systematicity of overabundance, either across lexemes or across cells. Consequently, it is suggested that flexemes can be an interesting technical solution for the creation of a lexicon of Latin verbs that not only documents all the competing wordforms available as principal parts, but also captures the systematic relationship that sometimes holds between variants filling different cells. A principled method to identify such systematicity is then described in detail. It is argued that a constructive approach based on the identity of stems and/or inflection class is not fully adequate for the data at hand. Therefore, the proposed procedure adopts an abstractive, word-based perspective that only relies on alternation patterns between unsegmented wordforms. Practical and theoretical implications of the work are finally discussed, particularly regarding the usefulness of a formal approach to the identification of lexical units and paradigm cells

Alternation (linguistics · Class (philosophy · Constructive · Epistemology · Identification (biology · Inflection · Lexicon · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Natural language processing · Perspective (graphical · Point (geometry · Principal (computer security · Process (computing · Computer Science · Lexicography and Language Studies · Mathematics · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence

• Towards a unified approach to inflectional and derivational predictions

  Open Access•Maura Pellegrini, Eleonora Litta et al.•Morphology•2026

  Incluir item

• Word and Paradigm Morphology

  James P Blevins•Word and Paradigm Morphology•2016

  Incluir item

• Parts and wholes

  Farrell Ackerman, James P Blevins et al.•Analogy in grammar•2009

  Incluir item

• The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory

  Jenny Audring, Francesca Masini•Oxford Handbook of Morphological…•2018

  Incluir item

• Overabundance and inflectional classification

  Open Access•Matías Guzmán Naranjo, Olivier Bonami•Glossa a journal of general…•2021

  Incluir item

• Patterns of interpredictability and principal parts in Latin verb paradigms

  Maura Pellegrini, Matteo Pellegrini•Journal of Latin Linguistics•2020

  Incluir item

• Morphological doublets in Croatian

  Open Access•Dario Lečić•Russian Linguistics•2015

  Incluir item

• Morphosyntactic variation and syntactic constructions in Czech nominal declension

  Open Access•Neil Bermel, Luděk Knittl•Russian Linguistics•2012

  Incluir item

• Morphology by Itself

  Andrew Spencer, Mark Aronoff•Language•1994

  Incluir item

• Oxford Latin Dictionary

  John C Traupman, P G W Glare•The Classical World•1984

  Incluir item

• Splits, internal and external, as a window into the nature of features

  Open Access•Greville G Corbett•Morphology•2022

  Incluir item