Crossing the doorsteps for social reform
The social crusades of Florence Kelley and Ellen Richards
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4885347 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Gabrielle Soudan (University of Lausanne, autor correspondente), David Philippy (0000-0001-8233-2129, CY Cergy Paris Université, autor correspondente), H Maas (0000-0002-5094-0477, University of Lausanne, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2021 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 501-525 |
| Data de publicação | 2021-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Science in Context (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0269-8897 • E-ISSN: 1474-0664 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0269889723000091 |
| PMID | 37690984 |
| OpenAlex | W4386585800 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 19 |
ArgumentThis paper contrasts the research strategies of two women reformers, Florence Kelley and Ellen Swallow Richards, which entailed different strategies of social reform. In the early 1890s, social activist Florence Kelley used the social survey as a weapon for legal reform of the working conditions of women and children in Chicago's sweatshop system. Kelley's case shows that her surveys were most effective as "grounded" knowledge, rooted in a local community with which she was well acquainted. Her social survey, re-enacted by lawmakers and the press, provided the evidence that moved her target audience to legal action. Chemist and propagator of the Home Economics Movement Ellen Richards situated the social problem, and hence its solution, not in exploitative working conditions, but in the inefficient and wasteful usage of available resources by the poor. Laboratory work, she argued, would enable the development of optimal standards, and educational programs should bring these standards to the household by means of models and exhibits. With this aim, she constructed public spaces that she ran as food laboratories and sanitary experiments. Kelley and Richards thus crossed the doorsteps of the household in very different ways. While Florence Kelley entered the household to change the living and working conditions of the poor by changing the law, Richards flipped the household inside out by bringing women into hybrid public laboratory spaces to change their behavior by experiment and instruction
Argument (complex analysis · Political science · Social reform · Sociology · American History and Culture · Law
Impatient Crusader
Ellen Richards’s Home Economics Movement and the Birth of the Economics of Consumption
“Dear Mr. Engels” unpublished letters, 1884–1894 of Florence Kelley (‐Wischnewetzky) to Friedrich Engels
Rethinking Home Economics
An American in Europe
Vital minimum
Fair-as-Foodway
Edward Atkinson
Pittsburgh Surveyed
Florence Kelley and the Nation's Work
It Might Have Been Euthenics
Make a Righteous Number
From Catharine Beecher to Martha Stewart
Crossing the doorsteps for social reform
Settlement Folk
Hull House in the 1890s
The New England Kitchen and the Origins of Modern American Eating Habits
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,6 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |