Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

How to Neutralize a Finite Clause Boundary

Phase Theory and the Grammar of Bound Pronouns

Dados Bibliográficos

ID5035792
AutoresThomas Grano (0000-0003-4657-9030, Indiana University, autor correspondente), Howard Lasnik (0000-0002-8221-9246, Department of Linguistics, University of Maryland, 1401 Marie Mount Hall, College Park, MD 20742, autor correspondente)
Ano2018
Volume49
Fascículo3
Páginas465-499
Data de publicação2018-07-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoLinguistic Inquiry (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0024-3892 • E-ISSN: 1530-9150
EditoraThe MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1162/ling_a_00279
OpenAlexW2810623962
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas21
Referências citadas48

A bound pronoun in the subject position of a finite embedded clause renders the clause boundary relatively transparent to relations ordinarily confined to monoclausal, control, and raising configurations. For example, too/ enough-movement structures involving a finite clause boundary are degraded in sentences like * This book is too long [for John to claim [that Bill read ___ in a day]] but improved when the finite clause has a bound pronominal subject as in ? This book is too long [for John1to claim [that he1read ___ in a day]]. This bound pronoun effect holds across a wide range of phenomena including too/ enough-movement, tough-movement, gapping, comparative deletion, antecedent-contained deletion, quantifier scope interaction, multiple questions, pseudogapping, reciprocal binding, and multiple sluicing; we confirm the effect via a sentence acceptability experiment targeting some of these phenomena. Our account has two crucial ingredients: (a) bound pronouns optionally enter the derivation with unvalued φ-features and (b) phases are defined in part by convergence, so that under certain conditions, unvalued features void the phasal status of CP and extend the locality domain for syntactic operations

Antecedent (behavioral psychology) · Boundary (topology) · Dependent clause · Generative grammar · Linguistics · Locality · Minimalist program · Non-finite clause · Object pronoun · Pronoun · Quantifier (linguistics) · Relative clause · Sentence · Subject (documents) · Subject pronoun · Upper and lower bounds · Computer Science · Language Development and Disorders · Mathematics · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Quotation as a challenge for feature-driven phases

    Jan Wiślicki•The Linguistic Review•2018

  • Reduced Embedded Questions with Multiple Wh-phrases in Chakhar Mongolian

    Open Access•Xue Bai•Acta Mongolica•2024

  • Short sources, islandhood, and pronominal correlates

    Open Access•Álvaro Cortés Rodríguez, James E Griffiths•Glossa a journal of general…•2024

  • Empirical challenges to the Form-Copy Theory of Control

    Open Access•Idan Landau•Glossa a journal of general…•2024

  • Licensing and anaphora in Tenyidie

    Open Access•Andrew Murphy, Savio M Meyase•Glossa a journal of general…•2022

  • Focus marking in Ikale and the final-over-final condition

    Open Access•Daniel Toluwalope Aremu•Linguistic Variation•2026

  • Antecedent-contained argument ellipsis in Japanese

    Open Access•Daiko Takahashi•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•2024

  • The right node raising analysis of coordinated wh-questions in Japanese

    Open Access•Jun Abe•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•2023

  • Multiple sluicing and islands

    Open Access•Álvaro Cortés Rodríguez•The Linguistic Review•2022

  • Displaced sentential complements to nouns in German

    Open Access•Andreas Blümel•The Canadian Journal of…•2021

  • Stripping and Topless Complements

    Susi Wurmbrand•Linguistic Inquiry•2017

  • In defense of the clause-internal phase

    Open Access•Asia Pietraszko•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2026

  • Fofc and what left–right asymmetries may tell us about syntactic structure building

    Open Access•Hedde Zeijlstra•Journal of Linguistics•2022

  • Movement and cyclic Agree

    Open Access•Stefan Keine, Bhamati Dash•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2023

  • Clause-internal successive cyclicity

    Open Access•Stefan Keine, Hedde Zeijlstra•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2025

  • Finiteness in a language without finite morphology

    Open Access•Nick Huang•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2024

  • Extended Phase Boundaries and the Spell-Out Trap

    Ken Safir•Linguistic Inquiry•2022

  • Attention and Locality

    Matthew Barros, Robert Frank•Linguistic Inquiry•2023

  • On the Syntax of Multiple Sluicing and What It Tells Us aboutWh-Scope Taking

    Klaus Abels, Veneeta Dayal•Linguistic Inquiry•2023

  • The meaning of the tough-construction

    Open Access•John Gluckman•Natural Language Semantics•2021

  • A Remark on the Economics of Quantifier Raising

    Jason Overfelt•Linguistic Inquiry•2020

  • A Two-Tiered Theory of Control

    Idan Landau, Samuel Jay Keyser•Two-Tiered Theory of Control•2015

  • Quantification and Syntactic Theory

    Open Access•Robin Cooper•Quantification and Syntactic Theory•1983

  • The Syntax of Silence

    Jason Merchant•The syntax of silence•2001

  • Phase Theory

    Open Access•Barbara Citko•Phase Theory•2014

  • Sentence processing without empty categories

    Martin J Pickering, Martin Pickering et al.•Language and Cognitive Processes•1991

  • Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension

    Open Access•Brian Mcelree, Stephani Foraker et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2003

  • Scope or Pseudoscope? Are there Wide-Scope Indefinites?

    Angelika Kratzer•Events and Grammar•1998

  • Derivation by Phase

    Noam Chomsky•Ken Hale•2001

  • Subjacency as a processing phenomenon

    Robert Kluender, Marta Kutas•Language and Cognitive Processes•1993

  • More Structural Analogies Between Pronouns and Tenses

    Open Access•Angelika Kratzer•Proceedings from Semantics and…•1998

  • Current Issues in Linguistic Theory

    Gary M Olson, Roger W Cole•The American Journal of Psychology•1979

  • Current Issues in Linguistic Theory

    Noam Chomsky•Current Issues in Linguistic Theory•1975

  • On the Nature of Proper Government

    Howard Lasnik, Mamoru Saito•Essays on Restrictiveness and…•1990

  • ‘Multiple Sluicing’ in Japanese and the Functional Nature of wh-Phrases

    Open Access•Taisuke Nishigauchi•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•1998

  • Extraction and Multiple Selection in Pp

    Richard K Larson•The Linguistic Review•1990

  • Direct Compositionality and 'Uninterpretability'

    Pauline Jacobson•Journal of Semantics•2012

  • Quantification and ACD

    Michael Hackl, Jorie Koster-Hale et al.•Journal of Semantics•2012

  • Additional-wh effects and the adjunction site theory

    Open Access•Mamoru Saito•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•1994

  • Move Wh in a Language Without Wh Movement

    C-T James Huang, C T James Huang•The Linguistic Review•1982

  • Reduced And Phrasal Comparatives

    Open Access•Winfried Lechner•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2001

  • A streamlined approach to online linguistic surveys

    Open Access•Michael Yoshitaka Erlewine, Hadas Kotek•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2016

  • Comparative Deletion And Optimality In Syntax

    Open Access•Claire Kennedy, Christopher Kennedy•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2002

  • Studies in Relational Grammar 1

    Steve Johnson, David M Perlmutter•Language•1984

  • Semantics in Generative Grammar

    Brogan Geurts, Bart Geurts et al.•Language•1999

  • Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language

    Edwin Battistella, Carol Georgopoulos et al.•Language•1992

  • Overt vs. Covert Movements

    Open Access•Richard S Kayne•Syntax•1998

  • Making a Pronoun

    Angelika Kratzer•Linguistic Inquiry•2009

  • First and Second Person Pronouns as Bound Variables

    Hotze Rullman•Linguistic Inquiry•2004

  • Referring and accessibility

    Open Access•Mira Ariel•Journal of Linguistics•1988

  • Explaining the locality conditions of QR

    Open Access•Carlo Cecchetto•Natural Language Semantics•2004

  • Competence, Performance, and the Locality of Quantifier Raising

    Kristen Syrett, Jeffrey Lidz•Linguistic Inquiry•2011

  • Movement and Control

    Norbert Hornstein•Linguistic Inquiry•1999

  • Diagnosing Cyclicity in Sluicing

    Calixto Agüero-Bautista•Linguistic Inquiry•2007

  • Some Interface Properties of the Phase

    Julie Anne Legate•Linguistic Inquiry•2003

  • Binding, Phases, and Locality

    Open Access•Vera Lee‐schoenfeld•Syntax•2008

  • Multiple Sluicing in English

    Open Access•Howard Lasnik•Syntax•2014

  • Agreement at PF

    Open Access•Idan Landau•Syntax•2016

  • Logical form, its structure and derivation

    Open Access•May, May May et al.•Lingua•1989

  • Wh-copying, phases, and successive cyclicity

    Open Access•Claudia Felser•Lingua•2004

  • A test of the relation between working-memory capacity and syntactic island effects

    Open Access•Jon Sprouse, Matt Wagers et al.•Language•2012

Obras citantes distintas21
Citações por ano2,33
Intervalo de citações2017 - 2026 (10)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 20
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae