Improving university students' web savvy
An intervention study
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 5264030 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sarah Mcgrew (0000-0002-8925-1468, Stanford Graduate School of Education Stanford University California USA), Mark Smith (0000-0002-1048-7786, Stanford Graduate School of Education Stanford University California USA), Joel Breakstone (0000-0003-0468-6399, Stanford Graduate School of Education Stanford University California USA), T Ortega (0000-0003-0486-6904, Stanford Graduate School of Education Stanford University California USA), Sam Wineburg (0000-0002-4838-1522, Stanford Graduate School of Education Stanford University California USA, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 89 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 485-500 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | British Journal of Educational Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0007-0998 • E-ISSN: 2044-8279 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/bjep.12279 |
| PMID | 30993684 |
| OpenAlex | W2940103192 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 34 |
| Referências citadas | 28 |
BackgroundYoung people increasingly turn to the Internet for information about social and political issues. However, they struggle to evaluate the trustworthiness of the information they encounter online.AimsThis pilot study investigated whether a focused curricular intervention could improve university students' ability to make sound judgements of credibility.SampleParticipants (n = 67) were students in four sections of a 'critical thinking and writing' course at a university on the West Coast of the United States. Course sections were randomly assigned to treatment (n = 29) and control conditions (n = 38).MethodsWe conducted a pre-and-posttest, treatment/control experiment using a 2 × 2 × 2 design (treatment condition × order × time) with repeated measures on the last factor. Students in the treatment group received two 75-min lessons on evaluating the credibility of online content. An assessment of online reasoning was administered to students 6 weeks prior to the intervention and again 5 weeks after.ResultsStudents in the treatment group were significantly more likely than students in the control group to have shown gains from pretest to posttest.ConclusionsResults suggest that teaching students a small number of flexible heuristics that can be applied across digital contexts can improve their evaluation of online sources
Intervention (counseling) · Mathematics education · Psychiatry · World Wide Web · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology
Media Literacy Education to Counter Truth Decay
Evaluating sources of scientific evidence and claims in the post-truth era may require reappraising plausibility judgments
A digital media literacy intervention for older adults improves resilience to fake news
A Design-Based Intervention to Develop Elementary Students’ Digital Literacy Skills
Digital competence in adolescents and young adults
Digital transformation and digital literacy in the context of complexity within higher education institutions
Teachers’ views on disinformation and media literacy supported by a tool designed for professional fact-checkers
Assessing University Students' Critical Online Reasoning Ability
How Do University Students’ Web Search Behavior, Website Characteristics, and the Interaction of Both Influence Students’ Critical Online Reasoning
A Signal Detection Approach to Understanding the Identification of Fake News
Who Is behind this? Preparing high school students to evaluate online content
The relation between critical online reasoning skills of first-semester university students and their epistemological beliefs
Vaccination Information Sources and Decision-Making Among Higher-Secondary Students in India During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Technology‐Embedded Argument‐DrivenInquiry in Preservice Chemistry Teacher Education
Building resilience against online misinformation
Designing an effective fact-checking education program
Misinformation Is Contagious
Can an online educational game contribute to developing information literate citizens
Conversations after lateral reading
Fighting “bad science” in the information age
Teaching Writing in the (New) Era of Fake News
The effects of inoculation interventions and repetition on perceived truth in younger and older adults
Trust the machine or the human? A dynamic neuro-cognitive model of Aigc credibility assessment
‘Do your own research
Baudrillard, hyperreality, and the ‘problematic’ of (mis/dis)information in social media
A systematic-narrative review of performance-based assessments of critical thinking in higher education
Building mental models from multiple texts
Inside Document Models
Effects of a classroom intervention on college students’ sourcing skills
Students evaluating the trustworthiness of historical sources and internet sources
Students’ Civic Online Reasoning
Civic Preparation for the Digital Age
How can we assess whether to trust collectives of scientists
Learning to evaluate sources of science (mis)information on the internet
Sourcing in Text Comprehension
Epistemic Thinking in Action
Developing a News Media Literacy Scale
Do Learners Really Know Best? Urban Legends in Education
Modern robust statistical methods
Why Learn History (When It’s Already on Your Phone)
Lateral Reading and the Nature of Expertise
Historical problem solving
In Google We Trust
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1
Try, Try, Try Again
Can Students Evaluate Online Sources? Learning From Assessments of Civic Online Reasoning
Cognitive Validity
Source Evaluation, Comprehension, and Learning in Internet Science Inquiry Tasks
| Obras citantes distintas | 34 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 5,67 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 34 |