Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Embedding Child Rights Principles and Practises in Mega Sport Event Planning

Dados Bibliográficos

ID5285331
AutoresOluwaseyi Aina (0000-0003-4486-2246, University of the West of Scotland, autor correspondente), D Mcgillivray (0000-0002-9383-2804, University of the West of Scotland), Sandro Carnicelli (0000-0003-1629-1343, University of the West of Scotland), G Mcpherson (0000-0003-4562-3386, University of the West of Scotland)
Ano2021
Volume3
Páginas695666-695666
Data de publicação2021-09-10
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoFrontiers in Sports and Active Living (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2624-9367 • E-ISSN: 2624-9367
EditoraFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fspor.2021.695666
PMID34568818
OpenAlexW3201464369
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas47

Recently, there has been growing concern about the lack of intentionality of mega sport event (MSE) organisers in ensuring that child rights are adequately respected, protected and promoted before, during, and after the events take place. In the context of the summer Olympic Games, reported child rights infringements have been on the rise, both in relation to abuse in sport itself and the negative consequences associated with planning and delivering the Games. In response to reports of child rights infringements, a coalition of actors, including non-governmental and civil society organisations have sought to pressure event owners and organisers to strengthen protections in the planning and delivery of their events. To date, however, child rights commitments have not been fully embedded in policies and principles guiding the planning and delivery of the Olympic Games. In this article, we explore the field of child rights in the context of the Olympic Games, focusing on a case study of the Tokyo 2020 edition. Drawing on documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews with Tokyo 2020 stakeholders and affiliates, detailed appraisal of the planning process was undertaken. Findings show that while the Japanese authorities have signed up to international child rights conventions and embedded some child participation strategies in Games-related activity, there was little evidence that Tokyo 2020 organisers had developed or implemented robust policies, principles or practises to respect, protect and promote child rights in Games planning. This absence, we argue, is because there was no requirement to embed child rights commitments during the bidding or planning phases, as the IOC had yet to enshrine human rights in its host city contract when the Games were first awarded to Tokyo. In conclusion, we argue that it is imperative the IOC embeds child rights principles and protocols in the bidding and planning processes to ensure that the risks to children are foregrounded and acted upon by host cities and their partners, elevating human rights to a position equal to other Games requirements. This study is of international significance as the evidence will aid future host city bidders to ensure children's rights are embedded in MSE policies for each nation

Bidding · Business · Child Rights · Context (archaeology · Event (particle physics · Human rights · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Children's Rights and Participation · History · Law · Sex work and related issues · Sport and Mega-Event Impacts · Marketing

  • Olympic Planning, Profit, and Participation

    Open Access•Seamus Byrne, Jan Andre Lee Ludvigsen•International Journal of the…•2022

  • Human rights and the olympics

    Open Access•Dikaia Chatziefstathiou, J Simon Rofe•Frontiers in Sports and Active…•2024

  • Exploring the Landscape of Children’s Rights in Sports

    Open Access•Georgios Pavlogiannis, Inger Eliasson et al.•Young•2024

  • In the shadow of sport mega-events

    Open Access•Jan Andre Lee Ludvigsen, Seamus Byrne•International Review for the…•2025

  • The qualitative research interview

    Open Access•Sandy Q Qu, Sandy Qu et al.•Qualitative Research in…•2011

  • Generating best evidence from qualitative research

    Open Access•Julie Green, Robert F Mager et al.•Australian and New Zealand…•2007

  • The Mega-Event Syndrome

    Marguerite Müller, Martin Müller•Journal of the American Planning…•2015

  • Using Nvivo for Data Analysis in Qualitative Research

    Hamed Hilal AlYahmady, Saleh Said Al Abri•International Interdisciplinary…•2013

  • Thematic Analysis

    G Terry, Nikki Hayfield et al.•The Sage Handbook of Qualitative…•2017

  • On Human Rights

    James Griffin•On human rights•2008

  • Global Civil Society

    Open Access•John Keane•Global Civil Society?•2003

  • Space, Voice, Audience and Influence

    Danielle Kennan, Bernadine Brady et al.•Practice•2018

  • Economies of (Alleged) Deviance

    Open Access•Amanda De Lisio, P Hubbard et al.•Sexuality Research and Social…•2018

  • Sociology and human rights

    Patricia Hynes, Michele Lamb et al.•The International Journal of…•2010

  • It's not for us’

    Paul Watts, Paul Watt•City•2013

  • The Youth Olympic Games

    Donna Wong•The International Journal of the…•2011

  • The Future of the Human Rights Movement

    Open Access•Beth A Simmons•Ethics & International Affairs•2014

  • Sex trafficking and the Vancouver Winter Olympic Games

    Open Access•Catherine M Matheson, Raphael Finkel et al.•Tourism Management•2013

  • Human rights abuses at the Rio 2016 Olympics

    Adam Talbot, Thomas F Carter•Leisure Studies•2018

  • A conceptual model and research agenda for bidding, planning and delivering Major sport events that lever human rights

    Open Access•D Mcgillivray, Michael B Edwards et al.•Leisure Studies•2019

  • Mega-sporting events and children’s rights and interests – towards a better future

    Suzanne Dowse, Sacha Powell et al.•Leisure Studies•2018

  • Understanding the denial of abuses of human rights connected to sports mega-events

    John Horne•Leisure Studies•2018

  • WhyIDidntReport

    Open Access•Michal Dolev-Cohen, Tsameret Ricon et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2020

  • Voice’ is not enough

    Open Access•Laura Lundy•British Educational Research…•2007

  • Who Makes the Decision

    Dennis R Howard, Robert Madrigal•Journal of Leisure Research•1990

  • Not just the Games? Power, protest and politics at the Olympics

    Open Access•M Patrick Cottrell, Travis Nelson•European Journal of International…•2011

  • Child Protection in Sport

    Open Access•Celia Brackenridge, Daniel J A Rhind et al.•Social Sciences•2014

  • Gentrifications in pre-Olympic Rio de Janeiro

    C Gaffney•Urban Geography•2015

  • Sovereignty transformed

    Open Access•Daniel Levy, Natan Sznaider•British Journal of Sociology•2006

  • Human rights and the Beijing Olympics

    Open Access•Susan Brownell•British Journal of Sociology•2012

  • Children's Participation Rights in Research

    Open Access•Mary Ann Powell, Anne B Smith•Childhood•2009

  • The gap between formalised children's rights and children's real lives in sport

    Open Access•Inger Eliasson•International Review for the…•2017

  • Human Rights in Sports

    Open Access•Bruce Kidd, Peter Donnelly•International Review for the…•2000

Obras citantes distintas4
Citações por ano1
Intervalo de citações2022 - 2025 (4)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae