From Heaven to Earth

Cultural Idealism' and 'Moral Realism' as Chinese Contributions to Global International Relations

Dados Bibliográficos

ID5777435
AutoresAtanu Acharya (0000-0002-7861-5895, American InterContinental University, autor correspondente), Amitav Acharya (Distinguished Professor at School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC, USA. He is also a Guest Professor at Nankai University, China and a Berggruen Institute Fellow (2019-20))
Ano2019
Volume12
Fascículo4
Páginas467-494
Data de publicação2019-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoThe Chinese Journal of International Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1750-8916 • E-ISSN: 1750-8924
EditoraOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/cjip/poz014
OpenAlexW2992283749
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas21
Referências citadas10

The discipline of International Relations (IR) is increasingly being criticized for ignoring and marginalizing states and societies outside of the core countries of the West. The idea of a 'Global IR' has been proposed since 2014 a pathway toward a bridging the 'West and the Rest' divide and thus develop a more inclusive discipline, recognizing its multiple and diverse foundations. At the same time, there is a trend toward developing theories, or 'schools', on a national or regional basis, the leading examples of which come from China. This article examines some theoretical constructs emerging in China, such as the 'Relational Theory' of Qin Yaqing, who is the foundational scholar in the 'Chinese School of IR', the Tianxia ('all under Heaven') concept as applied to IR and world order by Zhao Tingyang, and 'Moral Realism' of Yan Xuetong, who is the leading figure of the 'Tsinghua School'. To many scholars, both inside and outside China, the relationship among the various Chinese approaches and their overall contribution to the IR field remain unclear. Without claiming to capture all their nuances and complexity, this article hopes to stimulate a conversation among scholars, Chinese and foreign, with a view to generate greater clarity and highlight their importance to the study of IR. I argue that while making important contributions, the Chinese approaches to International Relations Theory (IRT) also face a number of challenges. This includes the need for them to offer more convincing proof that the concepts and explanations they propose can apply to other societies and to IR more generally. Moreover, there is the need for these approaches to attract a critical mass of followers worldwide, stimulate a research agenda for other, especially younger scholars, and distance themselves from the official Chinese policy framings. The Global IR approach offers a helpful framework for highlighting and perhaps addressing these challenges, especially in avoiding cultural exceptionalism and ensuring their wider relevance beyond China

China · CLARITY · Conversation · Epistemology · Heaven · International relations · International relations theory · Political science · Politics · Proposition · Realism · Sociology · Theology · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Chinese history and philosophy · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Philosophy