What can we learn about mental health from 10,933 patient lived experiences using a novel quantitative-qualitative network analysis

Objective: The study aims to build a comprehensive network structure of psychopathology based on patient narratives by combining the merits of both qualitative and quantitative research methodologies. Research methods: The study web-scraped data from 10,933 people who disclosed a prior DSM/ICD11 diagnosed mental illness when discussing their lived experiences of mental ill health. The study then used Python 3 and its associated libraries to run network analyses and generate a network graph. Key findings: The results of the study revealed 672 unique experiences or symptoms that generated 30023 links or connections. The study also identified that of all 672 reported experiences/symptoms, five were deemed the most influential; “anxiety,” “fear,” “auditory hallucinations,” “sadness,” and “depressed mood and loss of interest.” Additionally, the study uncovered some unusual connections between the reported experiences/symptoms. Discussion and recommendations: The study demonstrates that applying a quantitative analytical framework to qualitative data at scale is a useful approach for understanding the nuances of psychopathological experiences that may be missed in studies relying solely on either a qualitative or a quantitative survey-based approach. The study discusses the clinical implications of its results and makes recommendations for potential future directions

Mental health · Psychotherapist · Qualitative analysis · Qualitative research · Sociology · Computer Science · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology

• Increasing rigor and reducing bias in qualitative research

  Open Access•Penny Mackieson, Aron Shlonsky et al.•Qualitative Social Work•2019

  Incluir item

• Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network.

  Donald J Robinaugh, Alexander J Millner et al.•Journal of Abnormal Psychology•2016

  Incluir item

• The economic costs of mental disorders

  Open Access•Sebastian Trautmann, Jurgen Rehm et al.•The EMBO Reports•2016

  Incluir item

• Can network analysis transform psychopathology?

  Open Access•Richard J Mcnally•Behaviour Research and Therapy•2016

  Incluir item

• Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems

  Open Access•Denny Borsboom•Journal of Clinical Psychology•2008

  Incluir item

• Depression is not a consistent syndrome

  Open Access•Eiko I Fried, Randolph M Nesse•Journal of Affective Disorders•2015

  Incluir item

• Network analysis of depression and anxiety symptom relationships in a psychiatric sample

  Open Access•Courtney Beard, Alexander J Millner et al.•Psychological Medicine•2016

  Incluir item

• The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP)

  Roman Kotov, Robert F Krueger et al.•Journal of Abnormal Psychology•2017

  Incluir item

• Replicability and Generalizability of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Networks

  Open Access•Eiko I Fried, Marloes B Eidhof et al.•Clinical Psychological Science•2018

  Incluir item

• Network Analysis

  Denny Borsboom, Angélique O J Cramer•Annual Review of Clinical…•2013

  Incluir item

• Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017

  Open Access•L James, Spencer L James et al.•The Lancet•2018

  Incluir item

• The Structure and Function of Complex Networks

  M Newman, M E J Newman•SIAM Review•2003

  Incluir item

• Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification

  Open Access•Linton C Freeman•Social Networks•1978

  Incluir item

• Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality

  Open Access•Phillip Bonacich•Social Networks•2007

  Incluir item

• Interpretive Interactionism

  Patricia A Adler, Peter Alder et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1990

  Incluir item