Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Hyperpartisanship and the First Hundred Days

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6182467
AutoresTerri Bimes (The Charles and Louise Travers Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley, autor correspondente), Casey B K Dominguez (0000-0003-2515-4674, University of San Diego), Dan Grushkevich
Ano2023
Volume50
Fascículo1
Páginas51-75
Data de publicação2023-01-02
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoCongress & the Presidency (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0734-3469 • E-ISSN: 1944-1053
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07343469.2022.2110994
OpenAlexW4309196496
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas31

The troubled presidential transition of 2020–21 necessitates a renewed look at how rising partisanship has affected new administrations in the 21st century. Examining legislative output, confirmation votes, and executive orders during the first hundred days from 1953 to 2021, we show that there has been a decline in opposition party cooperation with newly elected presidents since the era of polarized parties and insecure majorities began. Our evidence suggests that strategic party behavior, as well as ideological polarization, has limited the ability of transition planning to foster early presidential success

Executive power · Ideology · Legislature · Opposition (politics · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Sociology · Transition (genetics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Politics and Society in Latin America · Public Administration

  • An Exploratory Study of Mayoral Transition Work

    Open Access•Matthew Lee, Quinton Mayne et al.•Public Administration Review•2025

  • The president in the legislative arena

    Jon R Bond•The president in the legislative…•1990

  • Red Fighting Blue

    Open Access•David A Hopkins•Red Fighting Blue•2017

  • Power without Persuasion

    William G Howell•Power Without Persuasion•2003

  • Polarization

    Nolan Mccarty•Polarization•2019

  • Executive Orders and the Modern Presidency

    Adam L Warber•Executive Orders and the Modern…•2006

  • Presidential Use of Executive Orders, 1953-1994

    Open Access•George A Krause, George Krause et al.•American Politics Quarterly•1997

  • Filibuster

    Gregory J Wawro, Eric Schickler•Filibuster•2013

  • Chapter Nine. The Policy Effects of Political Polarization

    Nolan Mccarty•Transformation of American Politics•2007

  • The Myth of the Imperial Presidency

    D P Christenson, Douglas L Kriner•The Myth of the Imperial Presidency•2019

  • Ideology & Congress

    Keith T Poole, Howard Rosenthal et al.•Ideology and Congress•2017

  • Insecure Majorities

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•Insecure Majorities•2016

  • Senate confirmation of appointments to the cabinet and executive office of the president

    Open Access•James D King, James W Riddlesperger•The Social Science Journal•1991

  • Validity and Reliability of Identifying Presidential Positions on Roll‐Call Votes in the Age of Trump

    Open Access•Jon R Bond•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2018

  • Unilateral Powers

    Open Access•William G Howell•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2005

  • Stalemate

    Open Access•Norman J Ornstein•Political Science Quarterly•2004

  • The President's Agenda

    Gerard Evans•International Affairs•1982

  • Advice and Consent

    Nolan Mccarty, Rose Razaghian•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • The President’s Role in the Partisan Congressional Arena

    Matthew J Lebo, Andrew J O’geen•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • Getting Ready for Day One

    Open Access•Martha Joynt Kumar•Public Administration Review•2008

  • The Policy Opportunities in Presidential Honeymoons

    Open Access•Matthew N Beckmann, Joseph Godfrey et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • An Integrative Approach to Modeling Presidential Success in Congress

    Brad Lockerbie, Stephen A Borrelli et al.•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Predicting Legislative Output in the First One-Hundred Days, 1897-1995

    Open Access•John P Frendreis, John Frendreis et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2001

  • The Partisanship of Bipartisanship

    Open Access•Sean Westwood•Political Behavior•2022

  • The Who, When, and Where of Executive Nominations

    Open Access•Gary E Hollibaugh, Lawrence S Rothenberg•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • To Revoke or Not Revoke? The Political Determinants of Executive Order Longevity

    Open Access•Sharece Thrower•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • The Logic of Collective Inaction

    Open Access•Ian Ostrander•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • The Longer You Wait, the Longer It Takes

    Heather Ba, Brandon Schneider et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2022

  • Is It a Honeymoon? An Empirical Investigation of the President's First Hundred Days

    Casey B K Dominguez•Congress & the Presidency•2005

  • Madison's Constitution Under Stress

    Open Access•Paul Pierson, Eric Schickler•Annual Review of Political Science•2019

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano1
Intervalo de citações2025 - 2025 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae