Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

"Why people say "yes

A dual-process theory of acquiescence

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6205572
AutoresEric S Knowles (autor correspondente), Christopher A Condon, Christopher Condon
Ano1999
Volume77
Fascículo2
Páginas379-386
Data de publicação1999-08-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
EditoraAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037//0022-3514.77.2.379
OpenAlexW4230828246
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas48
Referências citadas21

In 3 studies the authors investigated yea-saying acquiescence from the standpoint of D. T. Gilbert's (1991) 2-stage model of comprehension, wherein comprehension requires automatic acceptance during the first stage, which is then reconsidered and evaluated during a more effortful second stage. In Study 1 respondents' response times to 100 self-descriptive adjectives, 10 adjectives endorsing each pole of each of the Big Five personality factors, were measured. Yea-sayers said yes faster than appropriate responders or nay-sayers, but no answers took equally long for these 3 types of people. These findings were consistent with the proposition that yea-sayers truncate the reconsideration stage of processing. Studies 2 and 3 supported this model more directly with findings that answering questions under cognitive load increased yea-saying. Implications are drawn for self-report measurement

Acquiescence · Cognitive psychology · Dual (grammatical number · Dual process theory (moral psychology · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Process (computing · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Law · Psychology · Resilience and Mental Health · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology · Youth Education and Societal Dynamics

  • Assessing Three Sources of Misresponse to Reversed Likert Items

    Scott D Swain, Danny Weathers et al.•Journal of Marketing Research•2008

  • Thinking is Believing

    Eric Mandelbaum•Inquiry•2014

  • Misresponse to Reversed and Negated Items in Surveys

    Open Access•Bert Weijters, Hans Baumgartner•Journal of Marketing Research•2012

  • Planning and Conducting Experimental Advertising Research and Questionnaire Design

    Maggie Geuens, Patrick De Pelsmacker•Journal of Advertising•2017

  • Common Method Bias in Marketing

    Open Access•Scott B Mackenzie, Scott Mackenzie et al.•Journal of Retailing•2012

  • Is the Sogs an Accurate Measure of Pathological Gambling Among Children, Adolescents and Adults?

    Open Access•Robert Ladouceur, Carole Bouchard et al.•Journal of Gambling Studies•2000

  • Take It or Leave It

    Tatiana Sokolova, Aradhna Krishna•Journal of Consumer Research•2016

  • Navigating the Garden Path

    Open Access•Sarah K C Dygert, Andrew F Jarosz•Journal of Intelligence•2026

  • Uncovering the role of foreign language on acquiescence

    Open Access•Zhimin Hu, C Suitner et al.•Bilingualism Language and Cognition•2024

  • Destination image perception patterns of tourist typologies

    Open Access•Demet Ceylan, Beykan Cizel et al.•International Journal of Tourism…•2021

  • Self-deception and automatic belief

    Open Access•Francesco Marchi•Philosophical Psychology•2026

  • Does an Abstract Mind-Set Increase the Internal Consistency of Moral Attitudes and Strengthen Individualizing Foundations

    Open Access•Sinan Alper, Ozlem Yilmaz•Social Psychological and…•2020

  • Beyond the middle

    Open Access•Kemal Kurtuluş, Cigdem Basfirinci et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

  • Much ado about acquiescence

    Open Access•Yphtach Lelkes, Rebecca A Wei•Research & Politics•2015

  • Factors affecting responses to Likert type questionnaires

    Open Access•Boaz Shulruf, John Hattie et al.•Social Psychology of Education•2007

  • (Un)expected exception

    Johana Chylíková•International Journal of Social…•2020

  • Understanding ‘Don't know’ answers to survey questions - an International comparative analysis using interview paradata

    Kingsley Purdam, Joseph W Sakshaug et al.•Innovation The European Journal…•2020

  • Different Types of Religiosity and Lay Intuitions About Free Will/Determinism in Turkey

    Ozlem Yilmaz, Hasan G Bahçekapılı et al.•International Journal for the…•2018

  • Assessment of High School Students’ Understanding of DSM-IV-MR-J Items

    Open Access•Amélie Pelletier, Robert Ladouceur et al.•Journal of Adolescent Research•2004

  • Understanding adolescent engagement in media web surveys

    Ricardo Gonzalez, Dörte Naber et al.•Information Communication & Society•2025

  • Understanding how teachers practise inclusive classroom assessment

    Open Access•Pei-Ying Lin, Yu-Cheng Lin•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2019

  • Ask me, I (Dis)agree! Acquiescence in student ratings of teaching quality in German vocational schools

    Open Access•Johanna Marder, Richard Göllner et al.•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2021

  • Does Acquiescence Affect Individual Items Consistently

    Open Access•Chester Chun Seng Kam, Mingming Zhou•Educational and Psychological…•2015

  • The developmental psychometrics of big five self-reports

    Christopher J Soto, Oliver P John et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2008

  • You don't have to believe everything you read

    Tobias Richter, Sascha Schroeder et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2009

  • Social Desirability and Self-Reports

    Open Access•T Holtgraves•Personality and Social Psychology…•2004

  • Recovering Substantive Factor Loadings in the Presence of Acquiescence Bias

    Victoria Savalei, Carl F Falk•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2014

  • Unrestricted Factor Analytic Procedures for Assessing Acquiescent Responding in Balanced, Theoretically Unidimensional Personality Scales

    Pere J Ferrando, Urbano Lorenzo‐Seva et al.•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2003

  • The Effects of Questionnaire Length on the Relative Impact of Response Styles in Ambulatory Assessment

    Open Access•Kilian Hasselhorn, Charlotte Ottenstein et al.•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2024

  • A New Model for Acquiescence at the Interface of Psychometrics and Cognitive Psychology

    Hansjörg Plieninger, Daniel W Heck•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2018

  • Cognition is a matter of trust

    Ruth Mayo•European Review of Social…•2015

  • Response Styles in Survey Research

    Yves Van Vaerenbergh, Troy Thomas et al.•International Journal of Public…•2013

  • Using Only Numeric Labels Instead of Verbal Labels

    Open Access•Tobias Gummer, Tanja Kunz•Social Science Computer Review•2020

  • Linking the dots among destination images, place attachment, and revisit intentions

    Open Access•Nikolaos Stylos, Victoria Bellou et al.•Tourism Management•2017

  • How Do Children Respond to Verbal Irony in Face-to-Face Communication? The Development of Mode Adoption Across Middle Childhood

    Juanita M Whalen, Penny M Pexman•Discourse Processes•2010

  • Content’ versus ‘style’

    Open Access•Pieter Spooren, Dimitri Mortelmans et al.•British Educational Research…•2012

  • The role of cognitive resources in determining our moral intuitions

    Open Access•J C Wright, Galen L Baril et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2011

  • Spoilt for choice

    Open Access•Rebecca J Hafner, Mathew P White et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2011

  • An Improved Question Format for Measuring Conspiracy Beliefs

    Open Access•Clifford, Scott Clifford et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2019

  • What's in a name

    Sander L Koole, Ap Dijksterhui et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2001

  • The over-claiming technique

    Delroy L Paulhus, P D Harms et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2003

  • Belief and feeling

    Michael D Robinson, Gerald L Clore•Psychological Bulletin•2002

  • The Influence of Item Characteristics on Acquiescence among Latino Survey Respondents

    Open Access•Rachel E Davis, Sung-Hee Lee et al.•CAM•2020

  • Using Cognitive Interviewing and Behavioral Coding to Determine Measurement Equivalence across Linguistic and Cultural Groups

    Open Access•James F Thrasher, Anne C K Quah et al.•CAM•2011

  • Method Bias Mechanisms and Procedural Remedies

    Open Access•Minghui Yao, Yunjie Xu•Sociological Methods & Research•2024

  • When Change Matters

    Open Access•C Noah Uhrig, SC Noah Uhrig et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•2011

  • The Distinct Influence of Cognitive Busyness and Need for Closure on Cultural Differences in Socially Desirable Responding

    Ashok K Lalwani•Journal of Consumer Research•2009

  • Tactical Self-Presentations

    Daniel J Schneider, David J Schneider•Impression management theory and…•1981

  • Normal personality assessment in clinical practice

    Paul T Costa, Robert R Mccrae•Psychological Assessment•1992

  • Measurement and Control of Response Bias

    Delroy L Paulhus•Measures of personality and…•1991

  • Impression management theory and social psychological research

    James T Tedeschi•Impression management theory and…•1981

  • Acquiescence and Desirability As Response Determinants On the MMPI

    Open Access•Douglas N Jackson, Samuel Messick•Educational and Psychological…•1961

  • Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design

    Open Access•Lee J Cronbach•Educational and Psychological…•1950

  • Response Sets and Test Validity

    Open Access•Lee J Cronbach•Educational and Psychological…•1946

  • Impression management

    Mark R Leary, Robin M Kowalski•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • Acquiescence and Social Desirability Response Styles, Item Characteristics, and Conformity

    Open Access•Lawrence J Stricker•Psychological Reports•1963

  • Impression Management

    Marvin B Scott, Barry R Schlenker•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1981

  • Acquiescent Responding in Self-Reports

    Open Access•Eric S Knowles, Kobi T Nathan et al.•Journal of Research in Personality•1997

  • Using Balanced Scales to Control Acquiescence

    Jonathan Cloud, Graham M Vaughan•Sociometry•1970

  • How mental systems believe

    Daniel T Gilbert•American Psychologist•1991

  • A model of personality test item response dissimulation

    Ronald R Holden, Daryl G Kroner et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1992

  • Hypothesis confirmation

    Miron Zuckerman, C Raymond Knee et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1995

  • Agreeing response set and social desirability

    Arthur S Couch, Arthur Couch et al.•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1961

  • You can't not believe everything you read

    Daniel T Gilbert, Romin W Tafarodi et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1993

  • Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction

    M Snyder, William B Swann•Journal of Personality and Social…•1978

  • Ease of retrieval as information

    Norbert Schwarz, Herbert Ble et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1991

  • On cognitive busyness

    Daniel T Gilbert, Brett W Pelham et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1988

  • Self-reports

    Norbert Schwarz•American Psychologist•1999

Obras citantes distintas47
Citações por ano1,85
Intervalo de citações2000 - 2026 (27)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 48
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae