Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Using Cognitive Interviewing and Behavioral Coding to Determine Measurement Equivalence across Linguistic and Cultural Groups

An Example from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project

Dados Bibliográficos

ID2407398
AutoresJames F Thrasher (0000-0001-6418-4863, University of South Carolina, autor correspondente), Anne C K Quah (0000-0002-5303-8884, University of Waterloo), Gregory Dominick (University of Delaware), Gregory M Dominick (0000-0001-6256-503X, University of Delaware), Ron Borland (0000-0003-0059-178X, Cancer Council Victoria), Pete Driezen (0000-0003-2320-0999, University of Waterloo), Rahmat Awang (Universiti Sains Malaysia), Maizurah Omar (Universiti Sains Malaysia), Warwick Hosking (0000-0003-4707-5483, Victoria University), Buppha Sirirassamee (Mahidol University), Marcelo Boado (Universidad de la República de Uruguay)
EditoresGordon B Willis, Kristen Miller (0009-0006-1984-8310)
Ano2011
Volume23
Fascículo4
Páginas439-460
Data de publicação2011-11-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoCAM (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1087-8513 • E-ISSN: 1552-3969
EditoraSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1525822x11418176
PMID30867657
OpenAlexW2163505532
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas10
Referências citadas22

This study examined and compared results from two questionnaire pretesting methods (i.e., behavioral coding and cognitive interviewing [CI]) to assess systematic measurement bias in survey questions for adult smokers across six countries (United States, Australia, Uruguay, Mexico, Malaysia, and Thailand). Protocol development and translation involved multiple bilingual partners in each linguistic/cultural group. The study was conducted with convenience samples of 20 adult smokers in each country. Behavioral coding and CI methods produced similar conclusions regarding measurement bias for some questions; however, CI was more likely to identify potential response errors than behavioral coding. Coordinated qualitative pretesting of survey questions (or postsurvey evaluation) is feasible across cultural groups and can provide important information on comprehension and comparability. The CI appears to be a more robust technique than behavioral coding, although combinations of the two might be even better

Coding (social sciences · Cognition · Cognitive bias · Cognitive interview · Comparability · Comprehension · Cultural bias · Cultural diversity · Interview · Linguistics · Social science · Sociology · Anthropology · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

  • Development of a survey tool to measure pediatric experience of care

    Open Access•Teemar Fisseha, Elizabeth Bunde et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2026

  • Measuring wellbeing in the Global Flourishing Study

    Open Access•Richard G Cowden, Deborah Skinstad et al.•Quality & Quantity•2025

  • The Essential Role of Language in Survey Research

    Open Access•Tim J Gabel, Tim Gabel et al.•The Essential Role of Language in…•2020

  • Promoting cessation resources through cigarette package warning labels

    J F Thrasher, A Osman et al.•Tobacco Control•2014

  • Coding Issues of Open-Ended Questions in a Cross-Cultural Context

    Open Access•Evi Scholz, Brita Dorer et al.•International Journal of Sociology•2021

  • Why Do Cell Phone Interviews Last Longer? A Behavior Coding Perspective

    Open Access•Jerry Timbrook, Kristen Olson et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2018

  • The Practice of Cross-Cultural Cognitive Interviewing

    G B Willis•Public Opinion Quarterly•2015

  • Found in Translation

    Open Access•Patricia Rodriguez Espinosa, Nipat B Pichayayothin et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Exploring the Validity of Behavior Coding

    Open Access•Hyunjoo Park, Jaehwan Lee•CAM•2018

  • Translating Answers to Open-ended Survey Questions in Cross-cultural Research

    Open Access•Dorothée Behr•CAM•2015

  • Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research

    Open Access•Fons J R Van De Vijver, Kwok Leung et al.•Methods and Data Analysis for…•2021

  • Cognitive Interviewing

    Gordon Willis•Cognitive Interviewing•2005

  • The conceptual framework of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project

    G T Fong, K M Cummings et al.•Tobacco Control•2006

  • Methods of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey

    M E Thompson, G T Fong et al.•Tobacco Control•2006

  • Survey Questionnaire Translation and Assessment

    Open Access•Janet Harkness, Beth‐Ellen Pennell et al.•Methods for Testing and…•2004

  • Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires

    Open Access•Stanley Presser, Jennifer M Rothgeb et al.•Methods for testing and…•2004

  • Do Self-Report Instruments Allow Meaningful Comparisons Across Diverse Population Groups

    Steven E Gregorich•Medical Care•2006

  • Acquiescent Response Bias as an Aspect of Cultural Communication Style

    Open Access•P B Smith•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•2004

  • "Why people say "yes

    Eric S Knowles, Christopher A Condon et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1999

Obras citantes distintas10
Citações por ano0,83
Intervalo de citações2014 - 2026 (13)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 10
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae