Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Theories of Legislative Institutions and the Organization of the Russian Duma

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6232567
AutoresThomas F Remington (0000-0002-1109-3121), Stephanie S Smith (0000-0001-9943-6717), Steven S Smith
Ano1998
Volume42
Fascículo2
Páginas545
Data de publicação1998-04-01
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
EditoraJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2991770
OpenAlexW2334735949
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas16
Referências citadas7

Theory: Recent positive theory based on United States congressional studies argues for policy preference-based models to explain the choice of legislative institutions; an alternative theoretical approach holds that reelection goals shape preferences over institutional arrangements. Still other theorists emphasize supply-side explanations of partisanship and party leadership in enabling legislators to overcome collective action problems in policy and institutional choice. The question remains whether these diverse approaches can be combined into a single comprehensive theory. Hypotheses: The paper tests predictions flowing from policy, reelection, and party models for candidates' and members' preferences over several major organizational features of the new Russian State Duma, including its steering body, the powers assigned to party factions, and the rights of the chamber's chair. Method: Based on surveys conducted in 1993, 1994, 1995, and 1996 among candidates for and deputies in the Duma, the paper reports estimates of the effects of policy positions, electoral mandate type, and party affiliation on participants' preferences for institutional arrangements within the Duma. Results: Evidence consistent with each explanation is found, although none fully accounts for important features of the Duma's organization. We conclude that theoretical progress in this field is not likely to take the form of a unified theory but, at least for the time being, is more likely to take the form of more fully elaborating altemative perspectives and testing their implications directly against each other for particular aspects of institutional choice

Economics · Field (mathematics · Law and economics · Legislature · Management · Mandate · Microeconomics · Organizational theory · Political science · Positive economics · Preference · State (computer science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration

  • The Politics of Electoral Reform

    Open Access•Alan Renwick•Politics of Electoral Reform•2010

  • Searching for party effects in post-communist Ukraine

    Open Access•Frank C Thames, Frank Thames•Communist and Post-Communist…•2005

  • Legislative Activism of Russian Duma Deputies, 1996–1999

    Iulia Shevchenko, Grigorii V Golosov•Europe Asia Studies•2001

  • Superpresidentialism and Political Party Development in Russia, Ukraine, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan

    John Ishiyama, John T Ishiyama et al.•Europe Asia Studies•2001

  • Party and Personal Preference in Post‐Soviet Legislatures

    Open Access•Frank C Thames, Frank Thames•Social Science Quarterly•2004

  • Electoral Institutions and Party Cohesion in the Russian Duma

    Moshe Haspel, Thomas F Remington et al.•The Journal of Politics•1998

  • Candidate Recruitment and the Development of Russian Political Parties, 1993-99

    Open Access•John Ishiyama, John T Ishiyama•Party Politics•2001

  • Remaking the House and Senate

    Open Access•Eric Schickler, Eric Mcghee et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2003

  • Defending the Institutional Status Quo

    Open Access•Paul Chaisty•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2003

  • Invisible Politics

    Open Access•Tanya Bagashka•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Gaining Legislative Control Through Strategic District Nomination

    Open Access•Olga Shvetsova•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2002

  • Paradoxes of Parties in Congress

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1999

  • Legislative Structure

    Open Access•C Lawrence Evans, Ceryn Evans•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1999

  • Explaining Party Formation and Nonformation in Russia

    Open Access•Michael Mcfaul•Comparative Political Studies•2001

  • Parchment, Equilibria, and Institutions

    Open Access•John Michael Carey•Comparative Political Studies•2000

  • The Hidden Effects of Rules Not Broken

    Open Access•Kristin Kanthak•British Journal of Political…•2011

  • Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions

    Kenneth Shepsle, Barry Weingast•Positive theories of congressional…•1995

  • The logic of delegation

    D Roderick Kiewiet•The logic of delegation•1991

  • Congress

    David R Mayhew•Congress•2004

  • The Development of Parliamentary Parties in Russia

    Open Access•Thomas F Remington, Stephanie S Smith et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1995

  • The early legislative process in the Russian federal assembly

    Thomas F Remington, Stephanie S Smith et al.•Journal of Legislative Studies•1996

  • Institutional Context and Leadership Style

    Open Access•Joseph Cooper, D Brady et al.•American Political Science Review•1981

Citações por ano0,57
Intervalo de citações1998 - 2011 (14)
Altamente citadoNão
Abrir DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae