Remaking the House and Senate
Personal Power, Ideology, and the 1970s Reforms
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6301443 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Eric Schickler (0000-0002-2781-2987, Harvard University), Eric Mcghee (0000-0003-4524-9865, University of California, Berkeley), Josh Sides (0000-0003-1268-6612, The University of Texas at Austin), John Sides |
| Ano | 2003 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 297-331 |
| Data de publicação | 2003-08-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Legislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3162/036298003x200908 |
| OpenAlex | W2057353804 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 8 |
| Referências citadas | 27 |
Although much has been written on the critical congressional reforms of the 1970s, few studies have analyzed support for reform systematically. In this article, we draw upon previously untapped sources of information that make an individual‐level, quantitative analysis possible. We analyze 20 indicators that measure support for a wide variety of reforms in both chambers. Our results reveal a remarkably consistent pattern: in virtually every case, junior members and liberals were more pro‐reform than were senior members and conservatives. Also, Republicans were often more likely than Democrats to back reform. Our findings challenge the view that the reform movement was essentially a Democratic party phenomenon; liberals and junior members in both parties—not just Democrats—supported reform
Democracy · Ideology · Phenomenon · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics · American Political and Social Dynamics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Public Administration
Party Polarization in Congress
Reform in the Canadian Parliament and the US Congress
Congressional committee demographics and racially salient representation
Who Sets the Agenda? Participation Asymmetries in the Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress in the 116th Congress
Organizing Staff in the U.S. Senate
The Exercise of Party and Committee Leadership in the U.S. House, 1949–2011
Discharge Petitions, Agenda Control, and the Congressional Committee System, 1929–76
Landmarks in Thestudy Ofcongress Since1945
The Politics of Institutional Choice
Congress, keystone of the Washington establishment
Politics of Institutional Choice
Information and Legislative Organization
Why Parties?
The Transformation of the U.S. Senate
Congressional Budgeting
Bridging State and Society
Bridging State and Society
The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets
The House and Foreign Policy
Parties and leaders in the postreform house
Congress
Intergenerational Warfare
Interest Groups, Congressional Reform, and Party Government in the United States
The Advent of the Modern Congress
Theories of Legislative Institutions and the Organization of the Russian Duma
Making the Most of Statistical Analyses
Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting
Seniority 1975
Congressional Reform and Party Discipline
Commitment, Deference, and Legislative Institutions
Institutional Change in the House of Representatives, 1867-1998
Institutional Context and Leadership Style
Careerism, Committee Assignments, and the Electoral Connection
| Citações por ano | 0,33 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2002 - 2022 (21) |
| Altamente citado | Não |