Better Government, Better Science
The Promise of and Challenges Facing the Evidence-Informed Policy Movement
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6233080 |
|---|---|
| Autores | J Bowers (0000-0002-4048-1166, Department of Political Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA), Paul F Testa (Department of Political Science, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA), Paul Testa (0000-0001-9111-3796, Brown University) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 521-542 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-05-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Annual Review of Political Science (BOOK_SERIES) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1094-2939 • E-ISSN: 1545-1577 |
| Editora | Annual Reviews (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-124041 |
| OpenAlex | W2916554545 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 16 |
| Referências citadas | 95 |
Collaborations between the academy and governments promise to improve the lives of people, the operations of government, and our understanding of human behavior and public policy. This review shows that the evidence-informed policy movement consists of two main threads: ( a) an effort to invent new policies using insights from the social and behavioral science consensus about human behavior and institutions and ( b) an effort to evaluate the success of governmental policies using transparent and high-integrity research designs such as randomized controlled trials. We argue that the problems of each approach may be solved or at least well addressed by teams that combine the two. We also suggest that governmental actors ought to want to learn about why a new policy works as much as they want to know that the policy works. We envision a future evidence-informed public policy practice that ( a) involves cross-sector collaborations using the latest theory plus deep contextual knowledge to design new policies, ( b) applies the latest insights in research design and statistical inference for causal questions, and ( c) is focused on assessing explanations as much as on discovering what works. The evidence-informed public policy movement is a way that new data, new questions, and new collaborators can help political scientists improve our theoretical understanding of politics and also help our policy partners to improve the practice of government itself
Evidence-based policy · Government (linguistics · Policy studies · Political science · Politics · Public policy · Public relations · Sociology · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Law · Public Administration
Salient and contested scientific evidence in debates over sustainable transformation
Supporting frontline workers in the biodiversity crisis by empowering and enabling practitioners to embrace conservation evidence
Co-producing field experiments in public management research
Institutional fragmentation in United States protected area agencies and its impact on budget processes
Behavioral Implementation and Compliance of Anti-Epidemic Policy in the Covid-19 Crisis
Human Biomonitoring Data Enables Evidence-Informed Policy to Reduce Internal Exposure to Persistent Organic Compounds
Challenges and Prospects for Evidence-Informed Policy in Criminology
Blocked and “Unblocked” Learning
Who counts in civically engaged research? Rethinking expertise and authority in politics
Policy actors’ perceptions of qualitative research in policymaking
Communicating the Evidence
Learning from Local Government Research Partnerships in a Fragmented Political Setting
Buying Evidence? Policy Research as a Presidential Commodity
Engaged Pluralism
Research Impact Through Matchmaking (Ritm)
Why Do Practitioners Want to Connect with Researchers? Evidence from a Field Experiment
The Rationalizing Voter
Evidence-Based Policy
Information, Accountability, and Cumulative Learning
Experimental Foundations of Political Science
The Role of Application Assistance and Information in College Decisions
Behavioral Economics
The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial
Do Defaults Save Lives?
Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design
Is Ego Depletion Real? An Analysis of Arguments
Statistical analysis and optimal design for cluster randomized trials.
A series of meta-analytic tests of the depletion effect
An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning
Should Governments Invest More in Nudging?
Doing Unto Future Selves As You Would Do Unto Others
How Can Theory-Based Evaluation Make Greater Headway?
Reconsidering the Rational Public
Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests
Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults
Individual differences in reasoning
Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation
The Power of Suggestion
On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9
Evidence-based medicine
How open science helps researchers succeed
Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice
Status quo bias in decision making
Prospect Theory
Evidence based medicine
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
An Analysis of Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein’s Nudge
Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality
Libertarian Paternalism
How Policies Make Citizens
The Psychology of Survey Response
Protecting Soldiers and Mothers
The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy
The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology
Stylized Facts in the Social Sciences
A Systematic Review of Theory-Driven Evaluation Practice From 1990 to 2009
The Fairy Godmother—and Her Warts
Getting Out the Vote With Evaluative Thinking
Debate
Dual-process theories of decision-making
Statistical Models and Shoe Leather
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Save More TomorrowTM
Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems
Fishing, Commitment, and Communication
The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship
The Challenge of Big Data and Data Science
Standard Operating Procedures
Framing Theory
Heuristic Decision Making
On the Supposed Evidence for Libertarian Paternalism
Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron
Behavioral economics and climate change policy
The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined
The Role of Behavioral Economics in Evidence-Based Policymaking
Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials
Should social science be more solution-oriented
Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control
From Proof of Concept to Scalable Policies
The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science
The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout
| Obras citantes distintas | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,67 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 16 |