Is China-Taiwan Rapprochement Possible? Experimental Evidence From Taiwan

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6283575
AutoresHo-Hsien Pan (0000-0002-4701-9927, Associate Professor of of Sociology, Soochow University, Taipei, Taiwan, autor correspondente), Scott L Kastner (Professor, Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA), Margaret M Pearson (0000-0003-4266-9450, Professor, Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA)
Ano2025
Volume69
Fascículo7-8
Páginas1143-1171
Data de publicação2025-09-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766
EditoraSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00220027241300045
OpenAlexW4404601999
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas33

Any peaceful resolution to the Cross-Strait conflict between China and Taiwan is likely to be composed of give-and-take between the two sides, and any agreement will ultimately require the support of Taiwan’s citizens, by whom Taiwan’s leaders are held accountable. Yet little is known about the actual tradeoffs Taiwanese citizens are willing to make in pursuit of an agreement in a time of peace. In conjoint experiments fielded in Taiwan in April 2022, we present Taiwanese respondents with hypothetical Cross-Strait agreements that randomly assign economic, security, and sovereignty-related concessions by the two sides. We find that support for agreements is conditioned by the concessions included, with sovereignty-related or security-related concessions by Taiwan lowering support, and sovereignty or security-related concessions by China increasing support. Additionally, respondents indicate that neither US support nor PRC threats significantly influence support for agreements, and that Taiwan's acceptance of an agreement substantially reduces the perceived likelihood of conflict

Business · China · Development economics · Economics · International trade · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sovereignty · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Political Conflict and Governance