Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The Missing Link

Identifying Digital Intermediaries in E‐Government

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6365331
AutoresSergio Toro Maureira (0000-0003-1129-5441, School of Government and Public Administration Universidad Mayor Santiago Región Metropolitana Chile), Alejandro Olivares (0000-0001-6934-2437, Department of Political Studies Faculty of Government, Universidad de Chile Santiago Región Metropolitana Chile), Rocío Sáez‐vergara (0000-0002-4074-2493, Millennium Nucleus on Digital Inequalities and Opportunities Santiago Región Metropolitana Chile), Sebastián Valenzuela (0000-0001-5991-7364, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago Región Metropolitana Chile), Macarena Valenzuela (0000-0002-1707-5522, Universidad Católica de Temuco Temuco Región de la Araucanía Chile), Teresa Correa (0000-0003-0508-7371, Universidad Diego Portales Santiago Región Metropolitana Chile)
Ano2025
Volume86
Fascículo2
Páginas507-519
Data de publicação2025-09-07
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPublic Administration Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/puar.70033
OpenAlexW4414076690
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas68

Digital platforms are transforming how governments deliver public services; however, many citizens still depend on third parties to access them. This article identifies and classifies these “digital intermediaries” drawing from a national survey in Chile—a country with high digitalization but deep digital inequality. We find two major types of intermediaries: “close” actors (family and peers) and “hierarchical” actors (politicians, bureaucrats, and community leaders). These intermediaries support citizens who lack digital skills or access, playing an essential role in facilitating e‐government. The findings challenge the notion that digitalization guarantees direct, unmediated access to public services and underscore the importance of considering human support systems in digital governance

E-Government and Public Services · ICT Impact and Policies · Social Media and Politics

  • A Public Service Gap

    Peter Hupe, Aurélien Buffat•Public Management Review•2014

  • Policy Implementation, Street-level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion

    Lidewij Tummers, Victor Bekkers•Public Management Review•2014

  • Street-Level Bureaucracy and E-Government

    Aurélien Buffat•Public Management Review•2015

  • El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems

    Open Access•Susana Lloret-Segura, Adoración Ferreres-Traver et al.•Anales de Psicología•2014

  • How Management Matters

    Norma M Riccucci•How Management Matters•2005

  • Banishing bureaucracy

    David Osborne•Banishing bureaucracy•1998

  • Recontextualizing street‐level bureaucracy in the developing world

    Open Access•Gabriela Lotta, Roberto R C Pires et al.•Public Administration and…•2022

  • Revisiting the digital divide in Canada

    Michael Haight, Anabel Quan-Haase et al.•Information Communication & Society•2014

  • Growing Up in Technological Worlds

    Open Access•Claus J Tully•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2003

  • Bottom-Up Technology Transmission Within Families

    Open Access•Teresa Correa•Journal of Communication•2014

  • Bastard Culture! How User Participation Transforms Cultural Production

    Open Access•Mirko Tobias Schäfer•Bastard culture!•2011

  • Street-Level Bureaucracy and the Analysis of Urban Reform

    Open Access•Michael Lipsky•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1971

  • The Power of the Street-Level Bureaucrat in Public Service Bureaucracies

    Open Access•Jeffrey Prottas, Jeffrey Manditch Prottas•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1978

  • Evaluating heterogeneous brokerage

    Open Access•Matthew Hamilton, Jacob Hileman et al.•Social Networks•2020

  • A Study on the Current Status and Improvement of the Digital Divide among Older People in Korea

    Open Access•Woochun Jun•International Journal of…•2020

  • Traducciones de los equipos locales en la implementación de programas sociales en Chile

    Open Access•C Leyton•RUMBOS TS Un Espacio Crítico para…•2023

  • More E-Government, Less Street-Level Bureaucracy? On Legitimacy and the Human Side of Public Administration

    Gabriella Jansson, Gissur Ó Erlingsson•Journal of Information Technology…•2014

  • Social capital and urban environments in Southeast Asia

    Amrita Danière, L Takahashi et al.•International Development…•2005

  • Good governance and Covid‐19

    Open Access•Ahmed Mohammad Abdou•Journal of Public Affairs•2021

  • For better and for worse

    Open Access•Teresa Correa, Sebastián Valenzuela et al.•New Media & Society•2022

  • Disrupting the Welfare State? Digitalisation and the Retrenchment of Public Sector Capacity

    Open Access•Rosie Collington•New Political Economy•2021

  • Media literacy for older people facing the digital divide

    Open Access•Leopoldo Abad Alcalá•Comunicar•2013

  • Digital Inclusion in Rural Areas

    Open Access•Teresa Correa, Isabel Pavez•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2016

  • Electronic Government (E-Government) and Development

    Open Access•Christian Von Haldenwang•European Journal of Development…•2004

  • E-government success factors

    Open Access•Jose Ramon Gil-Garcia, Theresa A Pardo•Government Information Quarterly•2005

  • E-government and organizational change

    Open Access•Antonio Cordella, Niccolò Tempini•Government Information Quarterly•2015

  • The digitalising state

    Open Access•A Datta•Progress in Human Geography•2022

  • Actor roles in co‐production—Introducing intermediaries

    Open Access•Nathalie Haug•Public Administration•2023

  • Voto eletrônico remoto (i-voto) e a pandemia de Covid-19

    Open Access•Adrián Albala, André Borges et al.•Revista de Sociologia e Política•2023

  • Electronic Governance

    Open Access•Ignace Snellen•International Review of…•2002

  • Electronic government and public administration

    Open Access•David Brown•International Review of…•2005

  • Unraveling how intermediary‐beneficiary interaction shapes policy implementation

    Open Access•Cynthia L Michel•Regulation & Governance•2025

  • Taking Nonprofit Intermediaries Seriously

    Open Access•Jennifer Shea•Public Administration Review•2011

  • Party System Nationalization and the Provision of Public Health Services

    Open Access•Allen Hicken, Ken Kollman et al.•Political Science Research and…•2016

  • Street-Level Management

    Open Access•Drorit Gassner, Anat Gofen•Journal of Public Administration…•2018

  • State Agent or Citizen Agent

    Steven Maynard‐moody, Maynard-Moody et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2000

  • The electoral connection in presidential systems

    Ricardo Gamboa, Sergio Toro Maureira•Journal of Legislative Studies•2018

  • Disloyal Brokers and Weak Parties

    Open Access•Lucas M Novaes•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • Local government

    Dave Griffin, Eddie Halpin•Information Polity•2003

  • Understanding Implementation

    H C Hill•Journal of Public Administration…•2003

  • Clientelism

    Allen Hicken•Annual Review of Political Science•2011

  • El activismo burocrático y la vida mundana del estado. Las madres comunitarias como burócratas callejeras y el programa de cuidado de niños Hogares Comunitarios de Bienestar

    Open Access•Lina Buchely, Lina Fernanda Buchely Ibarra•Revista Colombiana de Antropología•2015

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae