Welcome to the Dark Side
Use of Humour in Indoctrinating to Extremist Ideologies
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6431996 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jani Sinokki (0000-0003-1554-2630, Department of Philosophy, Contemporary History, and Political Science University of Turku Turku Finland, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-08-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0021-8308 • E-ISSN: 1468-5914 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jtsb.70010 |
| OpenAlex | W4413168657 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 65 |
The paper argues that humour can be very effective in disseminating extremist ideologies, in part because of humour's inherent capacity to hinder critical reflection and in part because humour requires bringing together two conflicting frames of interpretation. With extremist humour, the other frame needed to make sense of what is funny is the extremist ideology itself. Thus, merely grasping what is funny in an extremist joke entails the ability to see and interpret other things through the lenses of that extremist ideology. Although this ability does not amount to accepting the ideology, the ability is the crucial first step in the process of converting audiences to the ideology. I argue that ideology should be understood as an interpretational framework, following the political theorist Michael Freeden, so that it is something that can be parsed from the joke by the audience making sense of the joke. This view of ideology opens a way for understanding how indoctrination to an ideology with humour occurs, explaining how ideology is transmitted, how it bypasses critical reflection and how it might cause dogmatism. The paper argues that this power stems not only from the cognitive mechanisms of humour processing but also from the deeper human needs that humour serves, the desire for communality and belonging and the creation of in‐group/out‐group distinctions (schismogenesis). The neo‐Nazi website, the Daily Stormer, which is notorious for using humour to garner new adherents for the white supremacist ideology and antisemitism, is used as a case study
Astronomy · Criminology · Great Rift · Ideology · Media studies · Physics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Humor Studies and Applications · Law · Psychology · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Social Psychology
Irony and Outrage
Ideologies and Political Theory
Critique of the Power of Judgment
An essay on the meaning of the comic.
Ideology
The Cultural Politics of Emotion
‘Race'
The Privileged Role of the Late-Night Joke
The Dawn of Everything
IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts
Ideology
Dogwhistles and Figleaves
Extremism
The Incel Rebellion
Social Identity Salience and the Emergence of Stereotype Consensus
Semantic Mechanisms of Humor
Identity and Intimacy Development, Humor Styles, and Psychological Well-Being
Who are the objects of positive and negative gossip at work
Relation between Intimacy and Humor
Smash and Laugh
Incel (E)motives
Assessing the Threat of Incel Violence
Insults, humour and freedom of speech
The relationship between humor and trust
All Joking Aside
Emotional Dynamics of Right- and Left-wing Political Populism
Indoctrination anxiety and the etiology of belief
Indoctrination, Coercion and Freedom of Will
How to make enemies and influence people
Jokes
Narratives of Success and Failure in Ressentiment
On the concept of political manipulation
The Concept of Manipulation
Essentialism goes social
Gossip in Evolutionary Perspective
Research on Gossip
Humor as a Double-Edged Sword
Human conversational behavior
A bias for social information in human cultural transmission
Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language
Contemporary Linguistic Theories of Humour
Culture Contact and Schismogenesis
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |