Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Creoles and sociolinguistic complexity

Response to Ansaldo

Dados Bibliográficos

ID7900646
AutoresMikael Parkvall (0000-0002-0840-1357, Stockholm University), Peter Bakker (0000-0002-2072-0430, Aarhus University, autor correspondente), John H Mcwhorter (Columbia University)
Ano2018
Volume66
Páginas226-233
Data de publicação2018-03-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoLanguage Sciences (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0388-0001 • E-ISSN: 1873-5746
EditoraElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.langsci.2017.10.001
OpenAlexW2771040353
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas5
Referências citadas21

In an earlier article in this journal, Umberto Ansaldo states that creoles are sociolinguistically the most complex of languages, equalled only by the situation in South India. In our article we show that this claim is not supported by facts about global multilingualism, creole societies, creole language structures and theories of language contact. The vast majority of the world’s population is multilingual: the average human speaks almost two languages. Nothing in the sociolinguistic situation of current creole societies is exceptional vis-à-vis situations of other minority languages. Yet, creoles differ structurally from the other languages of the world. That finding is supported by all empirical studies that include data on creoles and non-creoles, despite exceptionalists being accused of being inspired by ideology. The “feature pool theory” (cf. Mufwene 2001), analyzing creoles as simply language hybrids like a great many other languages, does not predict the relative analyticity of creole languages, since several equally analytic creoles and pidgins have come about from contact between morphologically rich languages. Crucially, adherents of this theory, including Ansaldo, have not responded to criticisms along these lines. Sudden language contact, as in situations of pidginization and creole genesis, leads to loss of irregularities and morphological paradigms. We argue that Ansaldo's claims are based on an insufficient familiarity with the relevant literature, as well as frequent misquotations

Creole language · Creolization · English-based creole languages · Epistemology · Language assessment · Language contact · Linguistics · Modern language · Multilingualism · Nothing · Population · Sociology · Theoretical linguistics · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Multilingual Education and Policy · Philosophy

  • Débat sur les créoles

    Open Access•Marianne Kilani-Schoch•Anthropen•2019

  • John H. McWhorter. 2018. The Creole Debate

    C Mair•English World-Wide A Journal of…•2019

  • Empiricism or imperialism

    Open Access•Felicity Meakins•Journal of Pidgin and Creole…•2022

  • Complexity reboot

    Open Access•Umberto Ansaldo•Language Sciences•2018

  • Empiricism against imperialism

    Open Access•Peter Bakker•Journal of Pidgin and Creole…•2025

  • The Ecology of Language Evolution

    Open Access•Salikoko S Mufwene•Ecology of Language Evolution•2001

  • The Rise and Fall of Languages

    Open Access•R M W Dixon•Rise and Fall of Languages•1997

  • The Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis

    Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun et al.•Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis•2017

  • Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time

    J Nichols•Linguistic Diversity in Space and…•1992

  • Transfer and language contact

    Open Access•Jeanette Sakel•International Journal of…•2012

  • Deconstructing creole

    Umberto Ansaldo, Stephen Matthews•Deconstructing Creole (Typological…•2007

  • Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable

    Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil et al.•Language complexity as an…•2009

  • Does multilingualism affect the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease

    Open Access•Richard M Klein, John Christie et al.•SSM - Population Health•2016

  • The sociolinguistic situation in Guadeloupe

    Kathe Managan•Journal of Pidgin and Creole…•2016

  • The Nature of Argument

    John Mcwhorter•Journal of Pidgin and Creole…•2012

  • Deconstructing Creole

    John Mcwhorter•Journal of Pidgin and Creole…•2008

  • Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles

    Peter Bakker, Aymeric Daval-Markussen et al.•Journal of Pidgin and Creole…•2011

  • You got Gungbe, but we got the numbers

    Peter Bakker•Journal of Pidgin and Creole…•2016

  • The Genesis of a Language

    Anthony P Grant, J Clancy Clements•Language•1997

  • Notes on the Structure of Chinook Jargon

    Melville Jacobs•Language•1932

  • Creole complexity in sociolinguistic perspective

    Open Access•Umberto Ansaldo•Language Sciences•2017

  • Chinook Jargon in the speech economy of Grand Ronde Reservation, Oregon

    Henry Zenk•International Journal of the…•1988

  • Against Creole Exceptionalism

    Open Access•Michel Degraff•Language•2003

  • Linguists' most dangerous myth

    Michel Degraff•Language in Society•2005

Obras citantes distintas5
Citações por ano0,63
Intervalo de citações2018 - 2025 (8)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae