Contribution of HCAHPS Specific Care Experiences to Global Ratings Varies Across 7 Countries
What Can be Learned for Reporting These Global Ratings
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9101957 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Benedict O Orindi (KU Leuven), Benedict Orindi (0000-0002-4601-7890, African Population and Health Research Center, autor correspondente), Emmanuel Lesaffre (0000-0002-3747-6905, KU Leuven, autor correspondente), Adrian Quintero (0000-0001-7268-2221, KU Leuven, autor correspondente), Walter Sermeus (0000-0002-5915-1845, KU Leuven), Luk Bruyneel (0000-0003-1209-692X, KU Leuven) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Fascículo | 11 |
| Páginas | e65-e72 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editora | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001077 |
| PMID | 30807453 |
| OpenAlex | W2917732164 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 31 |
BACKGROUND: Given the increased international interest in improvement strategies for patient experiences with care, it is important to understand whether the same specific care experiences affect global ratings across countries. Moreover, reporting of these global ratings currently substantially varies in both research and public reporting. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to examine the differential magnitude of associations between Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) specific care experiences and global ratings, and to explore implications for reporting these global ratings. METHODS: HCAHPS data were collected from 11,289 patients across 7 European countries. We studied the association between 11 experience items and 2 global ratings (0-10 hospital rating, hospital recommendation) using multilevel ordered logistic regression analysis. Using interaction terms, we examined consistency of these associations across countries. Assuming homogeneous use and interpretations of response categories of these specific experiences across patients within and between countries, we investigated what the associations between specific experiences and global ratings imply for reporting global ratings across countries. RESULTS: All specific experiences were associated with both global ratings. "Being talked to about care after leaving the hospital" showed the strongest association. There were relatively little differential effects across countries. A reporting strategy with different cutpoints across countries might provide a more equitable comparison of global ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight a differential contribution of HCAHPS specific experiences to overall ratings across countries. Research and public reporting may consider examining in more detail within and across populations global rating cutpoints that represent the same true level of positive patient experiences
Affect (linguistics) · Consistency (knowledge bases) · Differential (mechanical device) · Family medicine · Global health · Health care · Logistic regression · MEDLINE · Multilevel model · Political science · Public health · Statistics · Healthcare Policy and Management · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Psychology
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care
The cost of dichotomising continuous variables
Comparability of self rated health
Regression Models for Ordinal Data
Differential Item Functioning Results May Change Depending On How An Item Is Scored
Promises and Pitfalls of Anchoring Vignettes in Health Survey Research
Associations of CAHPS Composites With Global Ratings of the Doctor Vary by Medicare Beneficiaries’ Health Status
Impact of Cross-level Measurement Noninvariance on Hospital Rankings Based on Patient Experiences With Care in 7 European Countries
Do Differential Response Rates to Patient Surveys Between Organizations Lead to Unfair Performance Comparisons
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Patient Experience With Communication in Hospitals
Survey Response Style and Differential Use of CAHPS Rating Scales by Hispanics
Patient Judgments of Hospital Quality A Taxonomy
Components of Care Vary in Importance for Overall Patient-Reported Experience by Type of Hospitalization
Enhancing the Validity and Cross-Cultural Comparability of Measurement in Survey Research
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |