Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Comparative Responsiveness of Generic Versus Disease-Specific and Weighted Versus Unweighted Health Status Measures in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9102833
AutoresLouis Bessette (0000-0002-6834-2731, Université Laval, autor correspondente), Oliver Sangha, Karen M Kuntz (0000-0001-6335-7590), Robert B Keller, R Lew (0000-0003-3448-021X), Robert A Lew, Anne H Fossel, Jeffrey N Katz (0000-0003-2104-4670)
Ano1998
Volume36
Fascículo4
Páginas491-502
Data de publicação1998-04-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditoraOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-199804000-00005
PMID9544589
OpenAlexW1971552767
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas14
Referências citadas22

OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated the relative responsiveness to change of generic versus disease-specific and unweighted versus weighted health status measures in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: Data were obtained from 196 subjects followed in a prospective community-based cohort study in Maine who underwent carpal tunnel release (The Maine Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Study). Patients were evaluated before and 6 months after surgery. The disease-specific, unweighted severity score was derived from the validated Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Assessment Questionnaire. Patients were asked to rate the importance of each symptom included in the severity score. Each severity question was weighted by its importance, creating a disease-specific weighted score. Generic instruments were the SF-36, SF-12, and a Quality of Life Rating Scale. Sensitivity to change was calculated with the standardized response mean (SRM, mean change/standard deviation of change) as well as the effect size (ES, mean change/standard deviation of baseline values). The ability of the instruments to distinguish clinically important differences was assessed by correlating the changes in scores with global ratings on satisfaction and perceived improvement as external criteria. RESULTS: The disease-specific weighted score (SRM: 1.56, ES: 1.99) was more responsive than the unweighted score (SRM: 1.36, ES: 1.57). The Quality of Life Rating Scale, SF-36, and SF-12 subscales were less sensitive to change, with standardized response means and effect sizes that ranged from -0.23 to 0.88. The ability to distinguish clinically important differences was higher for the two disease-specific scales. The coefficients of correlation with the external criteria ranged from 0.50 to 0.56 for the unweighted score and 0.56 to 0.62 for the weighted score and were significantly stronger than the correlations between external measures and the most responsive subscale of the SF-36 (Bodily Pain subscale, r = 0.36). The SF-12 health survey performed as well as the SF-36 in term of responsiveness and ability to distinguish clinically important change. CONCLUSIONS: Disease-specific measures were superior to generic measures in capturing clinical change after carpal tunnel release, and a weighted score was slightly more responsive than the unweighted score. The SF-12 showed comparable psychometric properties compared with the longer 36-item Short-Form Survey

Carpal tunnel · Carpal tunnel syndrome · Cohort · Physical therapy · Prospective cohort study · Quality of life (healthcare) · Rating scale · Severity of illness · Standard deviation · Statistics · Foot and Ankle Surgery · Internal Medicine · Mathematics · Medicine · Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation · Peripheral Nerve Disorders · Surgery

  • Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design

    Open Access•Berrie Middel, Eric Van Sonderen•International Journal of…•2002

  • Is a Generic Quality of Life Instrument Helpful for Evaluating Women with Urinary Incontinence

    Open Access•Seung‐June Oh, Seung-June Oh et al.•Quality of Life Research•2006

  • Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life

    Open Access•Ross D Crosby, Ronette L Kolotkin et al.•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2003

  • Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life

    Open Access•Angela G E M De Boer, J Jan B van Lanschot et al.•Quality of Life Research•2004

  • On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments

    Open Access•Caroline B Terwee, F W Dekker et al.•Quality of Life Research•2003

  • How sharp is the short QuickDash? A refined content and validity analysis of the short form of the disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and function and specific joint conditions

    Open Access•Felix Angst, Jörg Goldhahn et al.•Quality of Life Research•2009

  • Measurement properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire in subjects with neurophysiological confirmation of carpal tunnel syndrome

    Open Access•Camilo Mendoza‐Pulido, Fernando Ortiz‐Corredor et al.•Quality of Life Research•2021

  • Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life measures in stroke

    Open Access•A Simon Pickard, Jeffrey Johnson et al.•Quality of Life Research•2005

  • Reliability and validity of functional health status and health-related quality of life questionnaires in children with recurrent acute otitis media

    Open Access•Carole N M Brouwer, Anne GM Schilder et al.•Quality of Life Research•2007

  • Effects of financial empowerment and self-confidence in financial empowerment on financial well-being

    Open Access•Su‐jung Nam•Current Psychology•2023

  • Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life

    Geoffrey R Norman, Jeff A Sloan et al.•Medical Care•2003

  • Use of SF-36 and SF-12 Health Status Measures

    Daniel L Riddle, Kang T Lee et al.•Medical Care•2001

  • Methodological Inquiries in Health Status Assessment

    Colleen A Mchorney•Medical Care•1998

  • Psychometric Properties of the SF-12 (Hebrew Version) in a Primary Care Population in Israel

    Marianne Amir, N Lewin-Epstein et al.•Medical Care•2002

  • Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures statistics and strategies for evaluation

    Open Access•Richard A Deyo, Paula Diehr et al.•Controlled Clinical Trials•1991

  • Measuring change over time

    Open Access•Gordon Guyatt, Gordon Guaytt et al.•Journal of Chronic Diseases•1987

  • Bootstrap Methods

    B Efron•The Annals of Statistics•1979

  • Measurement of health status

    Open Access•Roman Jaeschke, Joel Singer et al.•Controlled Clinical Trials•1989

  • Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life

    Open Access•Gordon H Guyatt, Gordon Guaytt et al.•Annals of Internal Medicine•1993

  • A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey

    John E Ware, Mark Kosinski et al.•Medical Care•1996

  • The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)

    John E Ware, Cathy Donald Sherbourne•Medical Care•1992

  • Physician use in Ontario and the United States

    Steven J Katz, Timothy P Hofer et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1996

  • Workers' compensation recipients with carpal tunnel syndrome

    Jeffrey N Katz, Laura Punnett et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1996

  • Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic Evaluation

    Matthew H Liang, Anne H Fossel et al.•Medical Care•1990

  • Generic and Disease-Specific Measures in Assessing Health Status and Quality of Life

    Donald L Patrick, Richard A Deyo•Medical Care•1989

  • Comparative Measurement Sensitivity of Short and Longer Health Status Instruments

    Jeffrey N Katz, Martin G Larson et al.•Medical Care•1992

  • Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status

    Lewis E Kazis, Jennifer J Anderson et al.•Medical Care•1989

Obras citantes distintas14
Citações por ano0,5
Intervalo de citações1998 - 2023 (26)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 13
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae