Aligning English Language Proficiency Standards With Content Standards
Shared Opportunity and Responsibility Across English Learner Education and Content Areas
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9733460 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Okhwa Lee (0000-0003-3551-1583, New York University, autor correspondente), Okhee Lee (New York University, New York, NY) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Fascículo | 8 |
| Páginas | 534-542 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Educational Researcher (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0013-189X • E-ISSN: 1935-102X |
| Editora | American Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3102/0013189x19872497 |
| OpenAlex | W2978460900 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 9 |
| Referências citadas | 9 |
The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 mandates that English language proficiency (ELP) standards align with content standards. As the fast-growing population of English learners (ELs) is expected to meet college- and career-ready content standards, the purpose of this article is to highlight key issues in aligning ELP standards with content standards. The overarching question is how to align ELP standards with academically rigorous and language-intensive disciplinary practices of content standards while respecting and maintaining the nature of the discipline within each area. I begin by describing contributions and shortcomings of content standards and ELP standards. Next, I propose consideration of three components in aligning ELP standards with content standards: (a) norms of disciplinary practices across content areas, (b) developmental progressions of disciplinary practices across K–12 grade levels or bands and across content areas, and (c) language use across levels of English proficiency. For each component, the challenges in establishing alignment and potential trade-offs in addressing these challenges are discussed. Finally, I highlight how these challenges present opportunities for substantive collaboration between EL education and content areas to move these fields forward and ensure ELs achieve academically rigorous content standards while developing ELP
Academic standards · Content (measure theory · Curriculum · Discipline · Higher education · Learning standards · Mathematics education · Next Generation Science Standards · Pedagogy · Political science · Population · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Psychology · Second Language Learning and Teaching · Student Assessment and Feedback · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
The impact of community-based versus university-based training on teachers’ self-efficacy in English learner instruction
Learning to Engage Multilingual Learners in Opportunities for Rich Language
Supporting Multilingual Students’ Mathematical Discourse Through Teacher Professional Development Grounded in Design-Based Research
“I relate everything in my life to music”
Science education with multilingual learners
The Mobility of Ideologies in Language Teacher Education
Toward asset‐oriented and definitionally clear terminology
Supporting teachers to enact science talk in early elementary classrooms
Promoting Multilingual Students’ Disciplinary and Language Learning Through the Wida Framework for Equitable Instruction
Rethinking diversity in learning science
Multimodality in the New Content Standards Era
English Language Proficiency Standards Aligned With Content Standards
Common Core State Standards for ELA/Literacy and Next Generation Science Standards
Science and Language for English Language Learners in Relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with Implications for Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,8 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 9 |