Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Anglo-Russian Convention and the Problem of Central Asia, 1907–1914

Bibliographic Data

ID10068554
AuthorsIra Klein (corresponding author)
Year1971
Volume11
Issue1
Pages126-147
Publication date1971-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of British Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-9371 • E-ISSN: 1545-6986
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/385621
OpenAlexW2103544834
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited4

For the British, the Anglo-Russian Convention was the culmination of repeated efforts, first begun by Lord Salisbury's government in the 1880s, later reiterated by the ministry of Arthur Balfour after the turn of the century, to come to terms with Russia in Asia. What was the effect on the British position in Asia of the agreement which the Liberal administration of Henry Campbell-Bannerman finally obtained in 1907? The actual working of the Convention in Asia has not received close attention. Since Britain and Russia were wartime allies, it appears to have been taken for granted that, before World War I, the Anglo-Russian Convention produced no major disenchantment or dangers for either partner. One purpose of this essay is to show that for the British, the Convention eventually generated serious dissatisfaction, that it failed to fulfill the British aim of halting Russian expansion in areas strategically crucial to the defense of India, and that in Central Asia after 1912, the Anglo-Russian Convention hindered rather than furthered the British quest for security. Further, a thesis of this paper is that Anglo-Russian relations dominated British policy in Central Asia, and that it was British anxiety about Russian expansion in Central Asia which led the British after 1912 to attempt to establish a veiled protectorate in Tibet. This view diverges from that of a recent major work on the once obscure history of Central Asia: in The McMahon Line , Professor Alastair Lamb emphasized the importance of Sino-Indian relations to the formulation of British policy in Central Asia

Ancient history · Central asia · China · Convention · Disenchantment · Economic history · Political science · Politics · Protectorate · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · History · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East

  • Imperial interests in the British decision for war, 1914

    Open Access•Keith Wilson, Keith M Wilson•Review of International Studies•1984

  • Great Game Thinking

    Heather Campbell, Heather A Campbell•Revolutionary Russia•2021

  • Big game hunting in Central Asia

    G J Alder, Garry Alder•The Journal of Imperial &…•1981

  • Between Man and Nature

    R GERALD HUGHES, Jesse Heley•Journal of Strategic Studies•2015

  • Grand Strategy and the Graveyard of Assumptions

    Christian Tripodi•Journal of Strategic Studies•2010

  • Russia and Britain in Persia

    Firuz Kazemzadeh•Russia and Britain in Persia•2013

  • The McMahon Line

    Open Access•Leo E Rose•China Report•1969

  • V. British Policy in the Balkans, 1908-9

    Open Access•M B Cooper•The Historical Journal•1964

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,11
Citation span1981 - 2021 (41)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae