Free Trade and Arms Races
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10071726 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rafael Reuveny (Indiana University), John W Maxwell (0000-0002-5987-578X, Indiana University), John Maxwell (Kelley School of Business, Indiana University) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 771-803 |
| Publication date | 1998-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022002798042006005 |
| OpenAlex | W2071798511 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 51 |
To examine the effect of free trade between two potential political rivals on their respective accumulation of weapons, the authors use a model in which utility maximization, the economics of trade and comparative advantage, production of weapons and consumption goods, depreciation of weapons stocks, technological spillover from production to national security, and the accumulation of capital are represented in an infinite horizon setting. In a neoclassical two-goods model of trade, each actor specializes in producing the good of its comparative advantage and engages in trade. Each country derives positive utility from consumption and its own stock of weapons. The impact of the foreign country's weapons stock on the home country's utility is negative (in the case of rivals). The authors use dynamic optimization to show that whether free trade leads to a rise or a decline in each country's stock of weapons relative to no trade depends on the relative marginal utilities of the consumption goods and weapons
Capital formation · Capital good · Comparative advantage · Consumption (sociology · Depreciation (economics · Economics · Financial capital · Human capital · International economics · International trade · Market economy · Microeconomics · Production (economics · Public good · Spillover effect · Stock (firearms · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Global trade and economics · International Development and Aid
Nations in conflict
Price Elasticities in International Trade
Lectures on Macroeconomics
National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade
Export subsidies and international market share rivalry
Trade Policy and Economic Welfare
Interdependence and Conflict
Expected Utility and Peace Science
Resource nationalism in the foreign policy behavior of oil exporting countries (1947–1974)
Arms Races and Escalation-A Reply to Altfeld
Highest stakes
Arms races
The Political Economy of War and Peace
Trade Liberalization among Major World Trading Areas
US Trade Policies in a Changing World Economy
Journal of Peace Research
Mathematical Models of the U.S. Military Expenditure Decision-making Process
The Steps to War
Political Similarity and American Foreign Trade Patterns
When Do “Relative Gains” Impede Trade
Conflict and Trade
Arms Races and Escalation
A Twist of Truth
Arms Races and Escalation
Military Spending in the United States, Soviet Union, and the People's Republic of China
Some Persisting Findings
Defense Expenditures, Security Threats, and Governmental Deficits
Can Arms Races Lead to the Outbreak of War
Economic Interdependence and International Conflict
Armaments and Escalation
Arms Races?-And Escalation? A Comment on Wallace
The Classical Liberals Were Right
From War to War to War
Trade Blocs, Trade Flows, and International Conflict
Anarchy and the limits of cooperation
Conflict, Cooperation, and Commerce
The Liberal Peace
Economic Interdependence
Arms Races and Escalation
Assessing the Liberal Peace with Alternative Specifications
Interdependence, Cooperation and Conflict
Does Trade Still Follow the Flag
Differential Paths to Parity
Guns, Butter, and Anarchy
Conflict, War, and Redistribution
Power Politics and International Trade
Bipolarity, Multipolarity, and Free Trade
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,13 |
| Citation span | 2002 - 2015 (14) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |