The Soviet Legacy and the Global South’s Reactions to Russian Invasion of Ukraine in the UN General Assembly
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10071728 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Qingjie Zeng (0000-0001-7739-6793, Fudan University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 70 |
| Issue | 7-8 |
| Pages | 1214-1244 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00220027261417920 |
| OpenAlex | W7124451096 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 49 |
Following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the United Nations General Assembly adopted multiple resolutions condemning the aggression and calling for the withdrawal of Russian forces. While some Global South countries supported these measures, many refrained from taking a critical stance toward Moscow, despite clear violations of international law. What accounts for this divided response? Departing from existing explanations that focus on contemporary geopolitical or economic interests, this paper traces Global South countries’ positions to the Soviet Union’s extensive Cold War–era interventions in the developing world. We argue that states that received greater volumes of Soviet aid are significantly more likely to align with Russia today, driven by both material dependencies and ideational legacies. Empirically, we demonstrate that the observed association withstands extensive robustness tests and is substantiated by evidence for both material and ideational mechanisms. These findings underscore the importance of a historical-institutional approach to understanding international alignment in the Global South and call for moving beyond the Liberal International Order framework when analyzing global responses to contemporary conflicts
Aggression · Developing country · General assembly · Geopolitics · Global South · International relations · Psychological intervention · Robustness (evolution · Economic, Social, and Public Health Issues in Russia and Globally · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Nuclear Issues and Defense
The Global Cold War
The Global South
Liberal Leviathan
Argentina and the Ukraine War
The war in Ukraine, the Global South and the evolving global order
Russia–Ukraine war and India's quest for leading power status
Aligned or non‐aligned
Russia in Africa
Shadow Cold War
Value Change in Global Perspective
Economic Action and Social Structure
Taming Hegemony
Foreign Aid and the Status Quo
Russia and global governance
China and Authoritarian Collaboration
Colonial Legacy and Foreign Aid
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and votes in favor of Russia in the UN General Assembly
Foreign Policy Strategies of Emerging Powers in a Multipolar World
Soviet treaties with third world countries
Soviet aid to the third world, an analysis of its strategy
South–South cooperation and the rise of the Global South
The Soviet Legacy and the Global South’s Reactions to Russian Invasion of Ukraine in the UN General Assembly
The Politics of Anti-Imperial Nostalgia
Russia Rising
Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data
Authoritarian Aid and Regime Durability
Tracing the Legacy
Defense Cooperation Agreements and the Emergence of a Global Security Network
Challenges to the Liberal Order
Dictators and Their Subjects
Identifying Ideologues
The Soviet Union/Russian Federation's Relations With South Africa, With Special Reference to the Period Since 1980
The Invasion of Ukraine, the Quest for a Multipolar World, and Russia's Civilizational Appeal to the Global South
Is Russia Losing in Ukraine but Winning in the Global South
Russia and the liberal order
Advancing foreign policy analysis by studying leaders from the global South
Do Natural Resources Fuel Authoritarianism? A Reappraisal of the Resource Curse
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |