Differences in Attentional Set Between Athletes and Nonathletes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10122003 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jim McAuliffe (Lakehead University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 131 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 426-437 |
| Publication date | 2004-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of General Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-1309 • E-ISSN: 1940-0888 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3200/genp.131.4.426-437 |
| PMID | 15523823 |
| OpenAlex | W2047282753 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 5 |
The purpose of this study was to determine if the ability to set attention is different between athletes and nonathletes. University volleyball players were compared with nonathletes on a spatial cuing task similar to that of C. L. Folk, R. W. Remington, and J. C. Johnston (1992). As expected, both groups showed evidence of entering into a specific attentional set because attentional cuing effects were found only when cues and targets shared a task-relevant feature (onset or color). In addition, the cuing effects when the cues matched the targets were greater for the athletes than for the nonathletes. The results are discussed in terms of the orienting of attention and athletic performance
Athletes · Cognitive psychology · Physical therapy · Set (abstract data type · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Medicine · Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Psychology · Sport Psychology and Performance
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2008 - 2008 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |