Structural Equation Modeling of Users' Response to Wilderness Recreation Fees
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10137611 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D Williams (0000-0002-9774-2910, Rocky Mountain Research Station, corresponding author), Daniel R Williams (Rocky Mountain Research Station USDA Forest Service), Christine A Vogt (0000-0001-7433-0799, and), Joar Vittersø (0000-0003-2056-8093, Eastern Norway Research Foundation Lillehammer, Norway) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 245-268 |
| Publication date | 1999-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Leisure Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-2216 • E-ISSN: 2159-6417 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00222216.1999.11949866 |
| OpenAlex | W2136365777 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 26 |
This paper examines wilderness users' response to recently established overnight camping fees at the Desolation Wilderness in California. Fee program evaluations have typically focused on economic or revenue issues, distributional or equity impacts of various pricing strategies, and questions of price fairness. In the case of wilderness recreation fees, it is also important to recognize the complex public purpose of wilderness and the long history of not having access fees in wilderness. To evaluate these various factors, this paper examines the impact of past wilderness experience and residential proximity on response to wilderness use fees using data from the 1997 Desolation Wilderness Fees Study. The results suggest general support for wilderness use fees, but fees are judged to be less appropriate for wilderness than for more developed recreation facilities and services. Structural equation modeling shows that experienced wilderness users, experienced Desolation Wilderness users, and users residing in close proximity to the Desolation Wilderness are less supportive of fees and less likely to see positive benefits from fees. A history of paying fees for access to other recreation sites and perceptions of wilderness problems, though positively related to past wilderness experience, do not contribute to fee support.KEYWORDS: Wildernessrecreation feespricingwilderness experiencestructural equation modeling
Econometrics · Economics · Political science · Recreation · Sociology · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Wilderness · Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research · Ecology · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Law · Mathematics · Psychology · Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management · Social Psychology
Financiamiento del servicio de educación al turista en áreas protegidas
Tourist taxation as a sustainability financing mechanism for mass tourism destinations
National park entrance fee increase
The Moderating Role of Place Attachment on the Relationship Between Attitudes Toward Fees and Spending Preferences
Variations in Tourist Price Sensitivity
Legitimacy and the Use of Natural Resources in Kruger National Park, South Africa
The price is “about”; right
Consumer Confidence and Recreation Behavior
Willingness to pay entrance fees to natural attractions
Fairness of prices, user fee policy and willingness to pay among visitors to a national forest
Estimating willingness to pay air passenger duty
An Examination of the Relationship between Leisure Activity Involvement and Place Attachment among Hikers Along the Appalachian Trail
Rearch Implications of the Theme Issues “Recreation Fees and Pricing Issues in the Public Sector” ( Journal of Park and Recreation Administration ) and “Societal Response to Recreation Fees on Public Lands” ( Journal of Leisure Research )
Do User Fees Exclude Low-income People from Resource-based Recreation
Place attachment and spending preferences in a local public park system
Economic values for recreational planning at Horton Plains National Park, Sri Lanka
Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.
Testing Structural Equation Models
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
An Economic Analysis of Funding Alternatives for Outdoor Recreation in the United States
Measuring the discriminatory impact associated with higher recreational fees
Defining past‐experience dimensions for wilderness recreation
Loyalty measurement
Lisrel Issues, Debates and Strategies
Recreation Specialization and Norms of Depreciative Behavior Among Canoeists
Characterizing the Influence of Past Experience on Recreation Behavior
Pricing for Efficiency and Revenue in Public Recreation Areas
Distribution and Efficiency Effects of Alternative Recreation Funding Methods
An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Information on Reference Prices for Public Swimming Pools
The Personal Meaning of Participation
Testing the Involvement Profile (IP) Scale in the Context of Selected Recreational and Touristic Activities
A Comparative Analysis for Wilderness User Fee Policy
The Influence of Past Experience on Wilderness Choice
Ego Involvement and Leisure Behavior
Psychological Bulletin
Comparative fit indexes in structural models
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,59 |
| Citation span | 1999 - 2023 (25) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 15 |