Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Structural Equation Modeling of Users' Response to Wilderness Recreation Fees

Bibliographic Data

ID10137611
AuthorsD Williams (0000-0002-9774-2910, Rocky Mountain Research Station, corresponding author), Daniel R Williams (Rocky Mountain Research Station USDA Forest Service), Christine A Vogt (0000-0001-7433-0799, and), Joar Vittersø (0000-0003-2056-8093, Eastern Norway Research Foundation Lillehammer, Norway)
Year1999
Volume31
Issue3
Pages245-268
Publication date1999-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Leisure Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-2216 • E-ISSN: 2159-6417
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00222216.1999.11949866
OpenAlexW2136365777
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited26

This paper examines wilderness users' response to recently established overnight camping fees at the Desolation Wilderness in California. Fee program evaluations have typically focused on economic or revenue issues, distributional or equity impacts of various pricing strategies, and questions of price fairness. In the case of wilderness recreation fees, it is also important to recognize the complex public purpose of wilderness and the long history of not having access fees in wilderness. To evaluate these various factors, this paper examines the impact of past wilderness experience and residential proximity on response to wilderness use fees using data from the 1997 Desolation Wilderness Fees Study. The results suggest general support for wilderness use fees, but fees are judged to be less appropriate for wilderness than for more developed recreation facilities and services. Structural equation modeling shows that experienced wilderness users, experienced Desolation Wilderness users, and users residing in close proximity to the Desolation Wilderness are less supportive of fees and less likely to see positive benefits from fees. A history of paying fees for access to other recreation sites and perceptions of wilderness problems, though positively related to past wilderness experience, do not contribute to fee support.KEYWORDS: Wildernessrecreation feespricingwilderness experiencestructural equation modeling

Econometrics · Economics · Political science · Recreation · Sociology · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Wilderness · Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research · Ecology · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Law · Mathematics · Psychology · Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management · Social Psychology

  • Financiamiento del servicio de educación al turista en áreas protegidas

    Open Access•Juan Antonio Aguirre González•PASOS Revista de Turismo y…•2008

  • Tourist taxation as a sustainability financing mechanism for mass tourism destinations

    Open Access•Pablo Juan Cárdenas-García, Juan Ignacio Pulido-Fernández et al.•International Journal of Tourism…•2022

  • National park entrance fee increase

    Suiwen Zou•Journal of Sustainable Tourism•2020

  • The Moderating Role of Place Attachment on the Relationship Between Attitudes Toward Fees and Spending Preferences

    Gerard T Kyle, James D Absher et al.•Leisure Sciences•2003

  • Variations in Tourist Price Sensitivity

    Benedict G C Dellaert, Kreg Lindberg•Leisure Sciences•2003

  • Legitimacy and the Use of Natural Resources in Kruger National Park, South Africa

    Randy J Tanner, Randy Tanner et al.•International Journal of Sociology•2010

  • The price is “about”; right

    Jerry J Vaske, Maureen P Donnelly et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•1999

  • Consumer Confidence and Recreation Behavior

    Nick A D Pitas, Suiwen Zou•Society & Natural Resources•2023

  • Willingness to pay entrance fees to natural attractions

    Open Access•Maria Reynisdottir, Haiyan Song et al.•Tourism Management•2008

  • Fairness of prices, user fee policy and willingness to pay among visitors to a national forest

    Open Access•Juliette Yuehtsen Chung, Jin Young Chung et al.•Tourism Management•2011

  • Estimating willingness to pay air passenger duty

    Open Access•Neelu Seetaram, Haiyan Song et al.•Annals of Tourism Research•2018

  • An Examination of the Relationship between Leisure Activity Involvement and Place Attachment among Hikers Along the Appalachian Trail

    Gerard T Kyle, GERARD KYLE et al.•Journal of Leisure Research•2003

  • Rearch Implications of the Theme Issues “Recreation Fees and Pricing Issues in the Public Sector” ( Journal of Park and Recreation Administration ) and “Societal Response to Recreation Fees on Public Lands” ( Journal of Leisure Research )

    Alan E Watson, Gamini Herath•Journal of Leisure Research•1999

  • Do User Fees Exclude Low-income People from Resource-based Recreation

    Thomas More, Thomas A More et al.•Journal of Leisure Research•2000

  • Place attachment and spending preferences in a local public park system

    Nick A D Pitas, Andrew J Mowen et al.•Journal of Leisure Research•2018

  • Economic values for recreational planning at Horton Plains National Park, Sri Lanka

    Rathnayake Mudiyanselage Wasantha Rathnayake•Tourism Geographies•2016

  • Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics

    Daniel Kahneman, Jack L Knetsch et al.•The Journal of Business•1986

  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis

    Li‐tze Hu, Peter M Bentler•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1999

  • Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.

    Robert C Maccallum, Michael W Browne et al.•Psychological Methods•1996

  • Testing Structural Equation Models

    J Scott Long, Kenneth A Bollen•Testing Structural Equation Models•2012

  • Structural Equations with Latent Variables

    Open Access•K A Bollen•Structural Equations with Latent…•1989

  • An Economic Analysis of Funding Alternatives for Outdoor Recreation in the United States

    Open Access•William R Mangun, John B Loomis•Review of Policy Research•1987

  • Measuring the discriminatory impact associated with higher recreational fees

    Stephen D Reiling, Hsiang‐Tai Cheng et al.•Leisure Sciences•1992

  • Defining past‐experience dimensions for wilderness recreation

    Alan E Watson, Michael J Niccolucci•Leisure Sciences•1992

  • Loyalty measurement

    Mark P Pritchard, Dennis R Howard et al.•Leisure Sciences•1992

  • Lisrel Issues, Debates and Strategies

    Richard Williams, Leslie A Hayduk•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1997

  • Recreation Specialization and Norms of Depreciative Behavior Among Canoeists

    J Douglas Wellman, Joseph W Roggenbuck et al.•Journal of Leisure Research•1982

  • Characterizing the Influence of Past Experience on Recreation Behavior

    Richard Schreyer, David W Lime et al.•Journal of Leisure Research•1984

  • Pricing for Efficiency and Revenue in Public Recreation Areas

    Donald Rosenthal, Donald H Rosenthal et al.•Journal of Leisure Research•1984

  • Distribution and Efficiency Effects of Alternative Recreation Funding Methods

    R Walsh, Richard G Walsh et al.•Journal of Leisure Research•1989

  • An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Information on Reference Prices for Public Swimming Pools

    Ronald E McCarville, John L Crompton•Journal of Leisure Research•1987

  • The Personal Meaning of Participation

    Neil Mcintyre•Journal of Leisure Research•1989

  • Testing the Involvement Profile (IP) Scale in the Context of Selected Recreational and Touristic Activities

    Frédéric Dimanche, Mark E Havitz et al.•Journal of Leisure Research•1991

  • A Comparative Analysis for Wilderness User Fee Policy

    William A Leuschner, Philip S Cook et al.•Journal of Leisure Research•1987

  • The Influence of Past Experience on Wilderness Choice

    Alan E Watson, Joseph W Roggenbuck et al.•Journal of Leisure Research•1991

  • Ego Involvement and Leisure Behavior

    Steven Selin, Steven W Selin et al.•Journal of Leisure Research•1988

  • Psychological Bulletin

    Lloyd G Humphreys, Warren S Torgerson et al.•American Psychologist•1965

  • Comparative fit indexes in structural models

    Peter M Bentler•Psychological Bulletin•1990

Unique citing works16
Citations per year0,59
Citation span1999 - 2023 (25)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 15

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae