Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Do people across the world want to remember positive ingroup histories

Bibliographic Data

ID10156308
AuthorsFiona Kazarovytska (0000-0003-3537-5710, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Katrín Árnadóttir (0000-0001-7217-9642, KU Leuven), Silvana D’ottone (0000-0002-0646-9876), Silvana D'Ottone (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile), Slieman Halabi (0000-0002-8663-1473, University of Wuppertal), Edward Clarke (Philipps University of Marburg), Suryodaya Sharma (0000-0002-6937-9966, University of Arts), Verena Heidrich (0009-0008-8798-3674, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Roland Imhoff (0000-0003-0807-463X, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz)
Year2026
Volume131
Issue1
Pages99-122
Publication date2026-01-29
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/pspi0000513
PMID41609597
OpenAlexW7126114147
LanguageEN

A key assumption in collective memory research is that group members are particularly inclined to preserve history that reinforces the ingroup's positive identity. Yet, this assumption lacks solid empirical support, as research has rarely measured the identity-protective potential of historical events considered important to remember. Theoretically, this support is essential because group members may engage with history for reasons other than benefiting their ingroup. We complement existing literature by systematically testing the identity-protective tenet using a bottom-up approach. After sampling a broad set of historical events, we assessed the identity-relevant characteristics attributed to the events and examined how these characteristics relate to group members' willingness to remember them. Across a preregistered study conducted in seven different national contexts ( N = 2,045 participants; N = 7,665 ratings of 360 unique events), we found that events viewed as involving the ingroup in an agentic manner were considered important to remember in most countries. At the same time, we observed notable cross-national variation in the willingness to preserve events in which the ingroup caused positive consequences, behaved morally, or experienced threats, with a stronger tendency to remember ingroup-favoring history in less individualistic or less globally connected countries. We discuss how these findings bridge a crucial empirical gap by demonstrating that identity protection likely represents only one component of collective remembrance, whose importance appears to vary considerably across countries. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved)

Collective identity · Empirical research · Identity (music · In-group favoritism · Individualism · Ingroups and outgroups · Set (abstract data type · Social group · Social identity theory · Social perception · Identity, Memory, and Therapy · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration · Social and Intergroup Psychology

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae