Feeling loved as a strong link in relationship interactions
Partners who feel loved may buffer destructive behavior by actors who feel unloved
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10165652 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eri Sasaki (0000-0003-4848-1088, University of Auckland, corresponding author), Nickola C Overall (0000-0002-9703-4383, University of Auckland), H T Reis (0000-0002-3542-6074, University of Rochester), Francesca Righetti (0000-0002-5126-1388, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Valerie T Chang (0000-0002-4916-4677, University of Auckland), Rachel S T Low (0000-0001-9537-386X, Victoria University of Wellington), Annette M E Henderson (0000-0003-4384-4791, University of Auckland), Caitlin S Mcrae (0000-0002-2299-5227, University of Auckland), Emily J Cro (0000-0001-5840-7805, University of Essex), Shanuki D Jayamaha (0000-0002-4440-6710, University of Auckland), Michael R Maniaci (0000-0001-6796-8954, Florida Atlantic University), Camille J Reid (University of Auckland) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 125 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 367-396 |
| Publication date | 2023-02-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1037/pspi0000419 |
| PMID | 36848105 |
| OpenAlex | W4322493624 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 79 |
Feeling loved (loved, cared for, accepted, valued, understood) is inherently dyadic, yet most prior theoretical perspectives and investigations have focused on how actors feeling (un)loved shapes actors' outcomes. Adopting a dyadic perspective, the present research tested whether the established links between actors feeling unloved and destructive (critical, hostile) behavior depended on partners' feelings of being loved. Does feeling loved need to be mutual to reduce destructive behavior, or can partners feeling loved compensate for actors feeling unloved? In five dyadic observational studies, couples were recorded discussing conflicts, diverging preferences or relationship strengths, or interacting with their child (total N = 842 couples; 1,965 interactions). Participants reported how much they felt loved during each interaction and independent coders rated how much each person exhibited destructive behavior. Significant Actors' × Partners' Felt-Loved interactions revealed a strong-link/mutual felt-unloved pattern: partners' high felt-loved buffered the damaging effect of actors' low felt-loved on destructive behavior, resulting in actors' destructive behavior mostly occurring when both actors' and partners' felt-loved was low. This dyadic pattern also emerged in three supplemental daily sampling studies. Providing directional support for the strong-link/mutual felt-unloved pattern, in Studies 4 and 5 involving two or more sequential interactions, Actors' × Partners' Felt-Loved in one interaction predicted actors' destructive behavior within couples' subsequent conflict interactions. The results illustrate the dyadic nature of feeling loved: Partners feeling loved can protect against actors feeling unloved in challenging interactions. Assessing Actor × Partner effects should be equally valuable for advancing understanding of other fundamentally dyadic relationship processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)
Buffer (optical fiber · Computer network · Feeling · Link (geometry · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Computer Science · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Psychology · Social Psychology
A triangular theory of love.
Psychology and the Study of Marital Processes
Observation of couple conflicts
What type of communication during conflict is beneficial for intimate relationships?
A Typology of Styles of Loving
Adult Romantic Attachment
RMediation
Revising Working Models Across Time
Adult attachment, stress, and romantic relationships
Partners’ Withdrawal When Actors Behave Destructively
Does Partners’ Negative-Direct Communication During Conflict Help Sustain Perceived Commitment and Relationship Quality Across Time
A Sense of Security
Self-Efficacy and Declines Over Time in Attachment Anxiety During the Transition to Parenthood
To “See” Is to Feel Grateful? A Quasi-Signal Detection Analysis of Romantic Partners’ Sacrifices
Taking Stock of Reality
When and for Whom Implicit Partner Evaluations Predict Forgiveness
Me or Us? Self-Control Promotes a Healthy Balance Between Personal and Relationship Concerns
How Power Affects Emotional Communication During Relationship Conflicts
I Gave Too Much
Moderation in Management Research
Attachment and dependence regulation within daily interactions with romantic partners
Attachment insecurity and inducing guilt to produce desired change in romantic partners
Does couple communication predict later relationship quality and dissolution? A meta‐analysis
Steps toward the ripening of relationship science
Repeated priming of attachment security influences later views of self and relationships
Responsive behaviors in good times and in bad
Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being
Emotion regulation, conflict resolution, and spillover on subsequent family functioning
A Dyadic Perspective of Felt Security
Behavioral indices of positivity resonance associated with long-term marital satisfaction
It’s the motive that counts
Can I tell you how I feel? Perceived partner responsiveness encourages emotional expression
The burden of empathy
A dyadic perspective of expressive suppression
Compassionate acts and everyday emotional well-being among newlyweds
Development and validation of a state adult attachment measure (Saam)
Measurement of romantic love
Through the looking glass darkly? When self-doubts turn into relationship insecurities
Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict
An interdependence account of sexism and power
Beyond positive psychology? Toward a contextual view of psychological processes and well-being
Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures
Buffering attachment-related avoidance
Behavioral variability reduces the harmful longitudinal effects of partners’ negative-direct behavior on relationship problems
Safely testing the alarm
How the head liberates the heart
When rejection stings
Attachment anxiety and reactions to relationship threat
Predicting relationship stability from both partners versus one
Putting the Partner Within Reach
Caution
Experiences and interpersonal consequences of hurt feelings and anger
Walking on eggshells
Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships
Intimacy as an interpersonal process
Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment
Actor and partner power are distinct and have differential effects on social behavior
When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated
The concept of love viewed from a prototype perspective
To Know You Is to Love You
Calibrating the sociometer
Care, need, and conceptions of love
Creating good relationships
Contagious depression
Attachment insecurity, biased perceptions of romantic partners’ negative emotions, and hostile relationship behavior
Conflict in close relationships
Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships
Once hurt, twice hurtful
Self-esteem and the quest for felt security
Prorelationship maintenance behaviors
Accommodation processes in close relationships
Regulating partners in intimate relationships
A theory and method of love
Saying “thank you
Optimizing assurance
Touch reduces romantic jealousy in the anxiously attached
A nice surprise
The expression of compassionate love in everyday compassionate acts
Compassionate love for close others and humanity
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |