Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cutting in Line

How Powerful Organized Interests Hasten & Delay Executive Branch Nominations

Bibliographic Data

ID10189166
AuthorsJ M Box-Steffensmeier (0000-0002-0878-6269, The Ohio State University), D P Christenson (0000-0003-4072-5391, University of Washington), Lauren Ratliff Santoro (0000-0002-8914-4507, University of Texas), Elizabeth Ann Steffensmeier, Elizabeth Steffensmeier (Cornerstone Research)
Year2025
Volume88
Issue3
Pages1115-1129
Publication date2025-04-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3816 • E-ISSN: 1468-2508
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/736336
OpenAlexW4409677726
LanguageEN
References cited62

Despite the potential to shape policy in every domain of government, organized interests have not been central to discussions of the nomination process for bureaucratic appointments. We test measures of the quantity of interest group opposition and support for nominees as well as the power of groups on nomination outcomes and duration. Using an original data set of interest involvement in nominations from the 106th to 115th Congresses, we find that powerful interests affect the timing of executive branch nominations for confirmation and return. Interests weigh in on nominations when the stakes are high, and legislators heed the call of the most powerful groups over the sheer number of groups. The influence of interests in the committee stage is similar but limited. Our analysis shows that organized interests affect the bureaucracy before nominees make it to office by speeding up or slowing down their time to confirmation, return, or withdrawal.

Business · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Economics · Executive branch · Executive functions · Executive summary · Law and economics · Line (geometry · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Finance · Law · Mathematics · Neuroscience · Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Psychology · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Psychology

  • The Population Ecology of Interest Representation

    Virginia Gray, David Lowery•The population ecology of…•1996

  • The Political Economy of Expertise

    Kevin M Esterling•The Political Economy of Expertise•2004

  • A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk

    Jason P Fine, Robert J Gray et al.•Journal of the American…•1999

  • Political Organizations

    James Q Wilson•Political Organizations•1995

  • The evolution and formation of amicus curiae networks

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, D P Christenson•Social Networks•2012

  • Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality

    Open Access•Phillip Bonacich•Social Networks•2007

  • Nuclear Fallout

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd, Michael S Lynch et al.•The Forum•2015

  • From Textbook Pluralism to Modern Hyperpluralism

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron, Cody Gray et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • Advising, Consenting, Delaying, and Expediting

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, Charles P Campisano et al.•Studies in American Political…•2016

  • The Very Best People

    Open Access•David E Lewis, Mark Richardson et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2021

  • Loyalty–Competence Trade‐offs for Top U.S. Federal Bureaucratic Leaders in the Administrative Presidency Era

    Open Access•George Krause, Anne Joseph O’connell•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2019

  • The Contemporary Presidency

    Open Access•Ian Ostrander•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Continuity, Competence, and the Succession of Senate‐Confirmed Agency Appointees, 1989‐2009

    Open Access•Matthew Dull, Patrick S Roberts•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2009

  • Experiential Learning and Presidential Management of the U.S. Federal Bureaucracy

    Open Access•George A Krause, George Krause et al.•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification

    Phillip Bonacich•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1972

  • The Politics of Obstruction

    Open Access•Nicholas O Howard, Jason M Roberts•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Advice and Consent

    Nolan Mccarty, Rose Razaghian•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • Emotions, Oral Arguments, and Supreme Court Decision Making

    Ryan C Black, Sarah A Treul et al.•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • Prioritized Interests

    Geoffrey M Lorenz•The Journal of Politics•2020

  • Confirmation Dynamics

    George A Krause, George Krause et al.•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • Partners in Advocacy

    Christine Mahoney, F R Baumgartner•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • Measuring Presidential Success in Congress

    George C Edwards•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Sounding the Fire Alarm

    Nancy Scherer, Brandon L Bartels et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Contributions by Interest Groups to Lobbying Coalitions

    M T Heaney, Philip Leifeld•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Appointment Delay for Vacancies on the Federal Communications Commission

    Open Access•David C Nixon•Public Administration Review•2001

  • The Politics of Requesting Appointments

    Open Access•Brandon Rottinghaus, Daniel E Bergan•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • Organized Interests' Advocacy Behavior in Alliances

    Open Access•Marie Hojnacki•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Senatorial Discourtesy

    Open Access•Lauren C Bell•Political Research Quarterly•2002

  • Adding Recess Appointments to the President's “Tool Chest” of Unilateral Powers

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Anthony J Madonna et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Measuring Bias and Uncertainty in DW-Nominate Ideal Point Estimates via the Parametric Bootstrap

    Open Access•Royce Carroll, Jamie B Lewis et al.•Political Analysis•2009

  • Diverse Lobbying Coalitions and Influence in Notice‐and‐Comment Rulemaking

    Open Access•Maraam A Dwidar•Policy Studies Journal•2022

  • Testing Theories of American Politics

    Open Access•Martin Gilens, Benjamin I Page•Perspectives on Politics•2014

  • Scoring Points

    Open Access•Jonathan Remy Nash•Perspectives on Politics•2006

  • Pinpointing the Powerful

    Open Access•Nils Ringe, Shanika L Wilson et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2016

  • Confirmation Dynamics

    Open Access•Timothy P Nokken, Brian R Sala•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2000

  • Now or later? A dynamic analysis of judicial appointments

    Open Access•Jinhee Jo•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2017

  • Executive appointments

    Open Access•Fang-Yi Chiou, Fang‐yi Chiou et al.•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2014

  • Appointee vacancies in US executive branch agencies

    Open Access•William G Resh, Gary E Hollibaugh et al.•Journal of Public Policy•2021

  • Strategic Appointments

    Anthony M Bertelli, A Bertelli et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2006

  • The Power of Institutions

    Open Access•Christine Mahoney•European Union Politics•2004

  • Time is of the Essence

    J M Box-Steffensmeier, Bradford Jones et al.•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • The Who, When, and Where of Executive Nominations

    Open Access•Gary E Hollibaugh, Lawrence S Rothenberg•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • Senatorial Delay in Confirming Federal Judges, 1947-1998

    Sarah A Binder, Sarah Binder et al.•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • Cue‐Taking in Congress

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M Box‐steffensmeier et al.•American Journal of Political…•2019

  • Lobbying for Justice

    Gregory A Caldeira, John Wright et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • The Logic of Collective Inaction

    Open Access•Ian Ostrander•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • Congressional Oversight Overlooked

    Mathew D Mccubbins, Thomas Schwartz•American Journal of Political…•1984

  • Malign Neglect

    Jon R Bond, Richard Fleisher et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2009

  • Control without Confirmation

    Open Access•Christina M Kinane•American Political Science Review•2021

  • From Abe Fortas to Zoë Baird

    Open Access•Glen S Krutz, Glen Krutz et al.•American Political Science Review•1998

  • Regulatory Regimes, Agency Actions, and the Conditional Nature of Congressional Influence

    Open Access•Charles R Shipan•American Political Science Review•2004

  • Quality Over Quantity

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, D P Christenson et al.•American Political Science Review•2013

  • Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy

    Open Access•Richard L Hall, Richard Hall et al.•American Political Science Review•2006

  • Coalitional Lobbying and Intersectional Representation in American Rulemaking

    Open Access•Maraam A Dwidar•American Political Science Review•2022

  • Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron, Albert D Cover et al.•American Political Science Review•1990

  • How Are Politicians Informed? Witnesses and Information Provision in Congress

    Open Access•Pamela Ban, Ju Yeon Park et al.•American Political Science Review•2023

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae