Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From Comparative to Interreligious Theology

Perry Schmidt‐Leukel's “Fractal” Version of Pluralism

Bibliographic Data

ID10197453
AuthorsJohn D’arcy May (0000-0001-6533-6718, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume44
Issue3
Pages376-379
Publication date2020-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Religious History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-4227 • E-ISSN: 1467-9809
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1467-9809.12683
OpenAlexW3087578856
LanguageEN

Perry Schmidt‐Leukel has proposed a “fractal” theory to correlate factors which are replicated across religious traditions. His aim is to develop notions of religious and theological pluralism which have become locked into a somewhat sterile conflict with “inclusivism.” A wide range of thinkers from a variety of religious traditions respond to his initiative, some applauding it, others criticising it as being too abstract to do justice to the particularity of religious phenomena. A highlight is Francis X. Clooney's defence of his comparative theology project as an alternative to pluralism. In reply, Schmidt‐Leukel generously accepts a number of criticisms while reasserting his proposal that on the basis of fractal theory a truly interreligious theology is possible. It remains to be seen how widely fractal theory applies to concrete religious phenomena

Epistemology · Fractal · Mathematical analysis · Pluralism (philosophy · Religious pluralism · Sociology · Theology · African cultural and philosophical studies · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Mathematics · Philosophy · Religious studies · Religious Studies

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae