From Comparative to Interreligious Theology
Perry Schmidt‐Leukel's “Fractal” Version of Pluralism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10197453 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John D’arcy May (0000-0001-6533-6718, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 376-379 |
| Publication date | 2020-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Religious History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-4227 • E-ISSN: 1467-9809 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9809.12683 |
| OpenAlex | W3087578856 |
| Language | EN |
Perry Schmidt‐Leukel has proposed a “fractal” theory to correlate factors which are replicated across religious traditions. His aim is to develop notions of religious and theological pluralism which have become locked into a somewhat sterile conflict with “inclusivism.” A wide range of thinkers from a variety of religious traditions respond to his initiative, some applauding it, others criticising it as being too abstract to do justice to the particularity of religious phenomena. A highlight is Francis X. Clooney's defence of his comparative theology project as an alternative to pluralism. In reply, Schmidt‐Leukel generously accepts a number of criticisms while reasserting his proposal that on the basis of fractal theory a truly interreligious theology is possible. It remains to be seen how widely fractal theory applies to concrete religious phenomena
Epistemology · Fractal · Mathematical analysis · Pluralism (philosophy · Religious pluralism · Sociology · Theology · African cultural and philosophical studies · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Mathematics · Philosophy · Religious studies · Religious Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|