Musicians' Ratings of Good versus Bad Vocal and String Performances
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 10201207 |
|---|---|
| Autores | John M Geringer (0000-0001-9179-8465, The University of Texas at Austin, autor correspondente), Clifford K Madsen (Florida State University) |
| Ano | 1998 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 522-534 |
| Data de publicação | 1998-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Research in Music Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0022-4294 • E-ISSN: 1945-0095 |
| Editora | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3345348 |
| OpenAlex | W2004772685 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 17 |
| Referências citadas | 11 |
This study continues a line of research attempting to ascertain the focus of musicians' attention when listening to music. It is the fifth study in a series structured to determine whether musicians demonstrate consistent listening patterns across excerpts intentionally designed to be perceived as good and bad performances. Soprano, tenor, violin, and cello excerpts varied considerably in intonation and tone quality and, to a lesser extent, in other performance aspects. In this study, 48 music students were asked to rate excerpts on traditional performance evaluation rating scales (phrasing/expression, intonation, rhythm, dynamics, tone quality) and give an overall rating. Results indicated that musician listeners consistently discriminated between the good and bad performances across all rating scales. Intonation was identified as the element most in need of improvement in performances. Significant differences were found also between the four timbres and the accompaniment conditions. Results of acoustical analyses that portray a variety of differences in the performances are discussed in relation to listener ratings
Acoustics · Active listening · Audiology · Cello · Cognitive psychology · Intonation (linguistics · Linguistics · Quality (philosophy · Rhythm · Singing · Statistics · Tone (literature · Variation (astronomy · Variety (cybernetics · Violin · Communication · Diverse Music Education Insights · Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Mathematics · Neuroscience and Music Perception · Psychology
Piano-accompanied solfège reading experiences of preservice music teachers
Effects of focus of attention instructions on listeners’ evaluations of solo instrumental performance
Expressive semitones
Research on the assessment of music performance from Maria Manturzewska’s early experiments to more recent studies
Can experts identify “open throat” technique as a perceptual phenomenon
Effects of Non-Musical Attributes and Excerpt Duration on Ratings of High-Level Piano Performances
Instrumentalists' Assessment of Solo Performances with Compact Disc, Piano, or No Accompaniment
Effect of Music Training and Musical Complexity on Focus of Attention to Melody or Harmony
In Tune or Out of Tune
Effects of Dark and Bright Timbral Instructions on the Production of Pitch and Timbre
The Role of Accompaniment Quality in the Evaluation of Solo Instrumental Performance
Forum
Sectional Versus Intact Evaluations of Four Versions of a Chopin Étude
The Effect of Register, Direction, and Magnitude on Musicians’ Evaluations of Chamber Ensemble Intonation
The Role of Accompaniment Quality in Band Directors’ Evaluations of Solo Instrumental Performance
Effects of Excerpt Tempo and Duration on Musicians' Ratings of High-Level Piano Performances
The Effects of Score Use on Musicians’ Ratings of Choral Performances
Judge-Group Differences in the Rating of Secondary School Trumpet Performances
Listeners' Preference for Music of Other Cultures
Continuous versus Summative Evaluations of Musical Intensity
Relationship of Selected Factors in Trumpet Performance Adjudication Reliability
Comparing Continuous versus Static Measurements in Music Listeners' Preferences
Consistency in Piano Performance Evaluation
Preferences of Undergraduate Music Majors for Sequenced versus Performed Piano Music
| Obras citantes distintas | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,71 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2002 - 2024 (23) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 17 |