Judge-Group Differences in the Rating of Secondary School Trumpet Performances

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10204841
AutoresHarold E Fiske (University of Western Ontario, London, Canada, autor de correspondencia)
Año1975
Volumen23
Número3
Páginas186-196
Fecha de publicación1975-10-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Research in Music Education (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0022-4294 • E-ISSN: 1945-0095
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2307/3344643
OpenAlexW1987453199
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas35

It was the purpose of this study to determine whether trumpet performances adjudicated by a group of seven competent brass specialists are rated differently from the same performances adjudicated by a similar group of nonbrass specialists. Its purpose also was to determine whether the performances are rated differently when the same judges were reassigned to judge groups as wind specialists and nonwind specialists. The trait terms used by the judges included intonation, rhythm, interpretation, technique, and overall. The results showed no significant differences for any of the traits when brass judges were compared with nonbrass judges. One trait, technique, was found to be rated significantly different when wind judges were compared with nonwind judges. In addition, technique was also found to be the most distinct trait when the groups of judges were combined into a single judge group and the five rated traits were intercorrelated

Developmental psychology · Interpretation (philosophy · Intonation (linguistics · Linguistics · Trait · Computer Science · Diverse Music Education Insights · Music Technology and Sound Studies · Musicians’ Health and Performance · Psychology · Social Psychology