Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Musicians' Ratings of Good versus Bad Vocal and String Performances

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10201207
AutoresJohn M Geringer (0000-0001-9179-8465, The University of Texas at Austin, autor de correspondencia), Clifford K Madsen (Florida State University)
Año1998
Volumen46
Número4
Páginas522-534
Fecha de publicación1998-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Research in Music Education (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0022-4294 • E-ISSN: 1945-0095
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2307/3345348
OpenAlexW2004772685
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas17
Referencias citadas11

This study continues a line of research attempting to ascertain the focus of musicians' attention when listening to music. It is the fifth study in a series structured to determine whether musicians demonstrate consistent listening patterns across excerpts intentionally designed to be perceived as good and bad performances. Soprano, tenor, violin, and cello excerpts varied considerably in intonation and tone quality and, to a lesser extent, in other performance aspects. In this study, 48 music students were asked to rate excerpts on traditional performance evaluation rating scales (phrasing/expression, intonation, rhythm, dynamics, tone quality) and give an overall rating. Results indicated that musician listeners consistently discriminated between the good and bad performances across all rating scales. Intonation was identified as the element most in need of improvement in performances. Significant differences were found also between the four timbres and the accompaniment conditions. Results of acoustical analyses that portray a variety of differences in the performances are discussed in relation to listener ratings

Acoustics · Active listening · Audiology · Cello · Cognitive psychology · Intonation (linguistics · Linguistics · Quality (philosophy · Rhythm · Singing · Statistics · Tone (literature · Variation (astronomy · Variety (cybernetics · Violin · Communication · Diverse Music Education Insights · Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Mathematics · Neuroscience and Music Perception · Psychology

  • Piano-accompanied solfège reading experiences of preservice music teachers

    Open Access•Elif Guven•Research Studies in Music Education•2021

  • Effects of focus of attention instructions on listeners’ evaluations of solo instrumental performance

    Open Access•D Gregory Springer, Brian A Silvey•International Journal of Music…•2022

  • Expressive semitones

    Open Access•Sheng-Ying Isabella Weng, Erkki Huovinen•Musicae Scientiae•2024

  • Research on the assessment of music performance from Maria Manturzewska’s early experiments to more recent studies

    Open Access•Małgorzata Chmurzyńska•Musicae Scientiae•2023

  • Can experts identify “open throat” technique as a perceptual phenomenon

    Open Access•Helen F Mitchell, Dianna T Kenny•Musicae Scientiae•2006

  • Effects of Non-Musical Attributes and Excerpt Duration on Ratings of High-Level Piano Performances

    Open Access•Joel Wapnick, Louise Campbell et al.•Musicae Scientiae•2009

  • Instrumentalists' Assessment of Solo Performances with Compact Disc, Piano, or No Accompaniment

    Open Access•Ruth V Brittin•Journal of Research in Music…•2002

  • Effect of Music Training and Musical Complexity on Focus of Attention to Melody or Harmony

    Lindsey Williams, Lindsey R Williams•Journal of Research in Music…•2005

  • In Tune or Out of Tune

    Open Access•John M Geringer, Rebecca B MacLeod et al.•Journal of Research in Music…•2015

  • Effects of Dark and Bright Timbral Instructions on the Production of Pitch and Timbre

    Open Access•D Gregory Springer, Amanda L Schlegel et al.•Journal of Research in Music…•2020

  • The Role of Accompaniment Quality in the Evaluation of Solo Instrumental Performance

    Open Access•D Gregory Springer, Brian A Silvey•Journal of Research in Music…•2018

  • Forum

    Open Access•Cornelia Yarbrough•Journal of Research in Music…•2002

  • Sectional Versus Intact Evaluations of Four Versions of a Chopin Étude

    Open Access•Joel Wapnick, Alice-Ann Darrow•Journal of Research in Music…•2012

  • The Effect of Register, Direction, and Magnitude on Musicians’ Evaluations of Chamber Ensemble Intonation

    Open Access•David S Miller•Journal of Research in Music…•2021

  • The Role of Accompaniment Quality in Band Directors’ Evaluations of Solo Instrumental Performance

    Open Access•Brian A Silvey, D Gregory Springer•Journal of Research in Music…•2019

  • Effects of Excerpt Tempo and Duration on Musicians' Ratings of High-Level Piano Performances

    Joel Wapnick, Charlene Ryan et al.•Journal of Research in Music…•2005

  • The Effects of Score Use on Musicians’ Ratings of Choral Performances

    Open Access•Jessica Nápoles•Journal of Research in Music…•2009

  • Judge-Group Differences in the Rating of Secondary School Trumpet Performances

    Open Access•Harold E Fiske•Journal of Research in Music…•1975

  • Listeners' Preference for Music of Other Cultures

    Open Access•Ruth V Brittin•Journal of Research in Music…•1996

  • Continuous versus Summative Evaluations of Musical Intensity

    Open Access•Ruth V Brittin, Robert A Duke•Journal of Research in Music…•1997

  • Relationship of Selected Factors in Trumpet Performance Adjudication Reliability

    Open Access•Harold E Fiske•Journal of Research in Music…•1977

  • Comparing Continuous versus Static Measurements in Music Listeners' Preferences

    Open Access•Ruth V Brittin•Journal of Research in Music…•1995

  • Consistency in Piano Performance Evaluation

    Open Access•Joel Wapnick, Patricia J Flowers et al.•Journal of Research in Music…•1993

  • Preferences of Undergraduate Music Majors for Sequenced versus Performed Piano Music

    Open Access•Joel Wapnick, Mary-Jo Rosenquist•Journal of Research in Music…•1991

Obras citantes distintas17
Citas por año0,71
Intervalo de citas2002 - 2024 (23)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 17
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae