Multimodal Dreamin’
California Transportation Planning, 1967–77
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10249439 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alex Karner (0000-0002-3651-8157, University of California, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 39-57 |
| Publication date | 2013-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Transport History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-5266 • E-ISSN: 1759-3999 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.7227/tjth.34.1.4 |
| OpenAlex | W1969780895 |
| Language | EN |
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) replaced the state's Division of Highways on 1 July 1973. Consistent with the creation of other state departments of transportation throughout the U.S.A. at the time, the enabling legislation envisioned a multimodal agency that would shift transportation policy and planning away from its highway emphasis. Competing conceptions of multimodalism and regional transportation governance advanced by key actors heavily influenced the policies and plans they proposed. Eventually, public and local government opposition to the implementation of multimodal transportation policies diminished the state's role while elevating the responsibilities of voluntary regional planning agencies. California's contemporary transportation policy goals remain similar to those that prevailed when Caltrans was created – reducing automobile dependency and promoting compact urban forms – but its transportation institutions were designed precisely to oppose their achievement. Supportive public coalitions now offer the best hope for realizing the state's multimodal dreams
Agency (philosophy · Business · Corporate governance · Government (linguistics · Legislation · Local government · Multimodality · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Public policy · Public relations · Public transport · Public work · Sociology · State (computer science · Transport engineering · Transportation planning · Computer Science · Engineering · Finance · Law · Public Administration · Public Spaces through Art · Rhetoric and Communication Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|