Social Challenge to Art in America
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10274706 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gifford Phillips (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1973 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 383 |
| Publication date | 1973-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Leonardo (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0024-094X • E-ISSN: 1530-9282 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1572887 |
| OpenAlex | W2320432989 |
| Language | EN |
The author discusses the appearance on the visual fine art scene in the U.S.A. in the 1950 ’s of popularism (the popularization of the elitist view of art) and in the 1960 ’s of populism (an egalitarian approach to artists, their work and the public). The steps that have been taken by the proponents of these two approaches to democratize art are reviewed, as well as the results so far obtained. He concludes that popularism has but little affected the elitist structure and the financing of the art establishment, which is more heavily in debt than ever before; the public seems to have become more confused about art than enlightened and the situation of artists has not been improved. On the other hand, populism tends to lead to over-optimism as to the possibility of overcoming social and economic realities and of solving the problems of maintaining the quality of the works of visual fine art. Nevertheless, he believes that populism cannot be dismissed because it represents very real dissatisfactions by important components of the American art world. L’auteur rend compte de l’apparition sur la scene des arts plastiques aux Etats-Unis, vers 1950, du popularisme (une vulgarisation de la conception élitiste de l’art) et, dans les années 60, du populisme (une approche égalitariste des artistes, de leurs oeuvres et du public). II passe en revue aussi bien les différentes démarches que les résultats obtenus par les tenants de ces deux courants tendant à démocratiser l’art. Il en conclut que le popularisme n’a que peu affecté la structure élitiste et le mode de financement des institutions artistiques qui sont plus endettées que jamais; le public semble plus embrouillé quéclairé sur les questions artistiques, et la situation des artistes ne s’est pas améliorée. D’autre part, le populisme tend à favoriser un optimisme excessif en ce qui concerne la possibilité de surmonter les réalités économiques et sociales et de maintenir la qualité des oeuvres d’art. Néanmoins il pense qu’on ne peut ignorer le populisme, car il refléte le trés réel mécontentement de fractions importantes du monde artistique américain
Art · Sociology · Visual arts · Art Education and Development
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |