Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The evolution of Qajar bureacracy

1779–1879

Bibliographic Data

ID10279906
AuthorsShaul Bakhash (0009-0004-0109-2573, corresponding author)
Year1971
Volume7
Issue2
Pages139-168
Publication date1971-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMiddle Eastern Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0026-3206 • E-ISSN: 1743-7881
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00263207108700172
OpenAlexW2058998379
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited1

When Agha Muhammad Qajar (1779-97) left Shiraz at the death of Karim Khan (1750-79) and rode to the Qajar tribal country, he did more than collect horsemen for his tribal army. At Astarabad, the home of the Qajars, he took into his employ one Mirza Isma'il, a steward to a Qajar tribal chief, as his revenue officer (ntustawfi). At Mazanderan, he picked up a second officer, Mirza Asadullah Nuri, to act as revenue officer-secretary to the army (lashkar nevis).1 These two men, and this early separation of military and non-military financial affairs, formed the embryo of Agha Muhammad's 'bureaucracy'. In the twelve years between Agha Muhammad's first bid for power and the final conquest of Shiraz in 1791 and his assumption of the Persian throne, these two men accompanied Agha Muhammad on his military campaigns, performing their simple, but essential, functions. Wherever he went with Agha Muhammad, Mirza Isma'il, the mustawfi, gathered information on the amount of taxes collected in each province, district or town, the manner of its collection and the character of the local tax officials. He took copies of the local tax lists and continued to update this information until he was able to obtain access to the central records office in Shiraz. At Shiraz, Agha Muhammad took into his service Hajji Ibrahim Shirazi, the kalantar of the Zand capital, who had turned against his Zand chief and had opened the gates of Shiraz to Agha Muhammad. This man later became the shah's chief minister. Although it can be assumed that, along with Hajji Ibrahim, Agha Muhammad inherited the rest of the Zand bureaucracy, he does not appear to have expanded his top-level administration beyond these three principal officers.2 Agha Muhammad had no official private secretary, no minister of justice, no minister of court. He ran a highly personal administration and, finances aside, paper work was almost non-existent. He himself administered justice, punished and disciplined his officers and supervised accounts. As 'Abdullah Mustawfi has written, 'Agha Muhammad was himself the treasurer, minister of finance and saheb-e divan of his own government'.3 Members of the administration were attached to him in almost physical fashion. The shah was constantly on the move, and the bureaucracy moved with him. After he transferred the capital to Tehran, Agha Muhammad established Fath 'Ali, his nephew and chosen successor, in Shiraz and when on campaign, generally left Hajji Ibrahim to supervise matters in Tehran. But the two treasurers, the mustawfi and the lashkar nevis, continued to accompany him on his wars, and both of them were with him when he was killed on his last campaign.4 He recognized no division between the privy purse and the public treasury. In fact Agha Muhammad kept the royal treasure under his personal lock and key. Salaries to troops and officials were generally paid

Ancient history · Genealogy · Byzantine Studies and History · Eurasian Exchange Networks · History · Islamic Studies and History

  • Popular Entertainment, Media and Social Change in Twentieth-Century Iran

    Open Access•Peter Chelkowski•The Cambridge history of Iran.•1991

  • Iranian Relations With Great Britain and British India, 1798–1921

    Open Access•R W Greaves, Rose Greaves•The Cambridge history of Iran.•1991

  • Iranian Foreign Policy, 1921–1979

    Open Access•Amin Saikal•The Cambridge history of Iran.•1991

  • Iranian Relations With Russia and the Soviet Union, to 1921

    Open Access•Firuz Kazemzadeh•The Cambridge history of Iran.•1991

  • The Pahlavī Autocracy

    Open Access•Gavin R G Hambly•The Cambridge history of Iran.•1991

  • Religious Forces in Eighteenth- And Nineteenth-Century Iran

    Open Access•Hamid Algar•The Cambridge history of Iran.•1991

  • Iran Under the Later Qājārs, 1848–1922

    Open Access•Nikki R Keddie, Nikki Keddie et al.•The Cambridge history of Iran.•1991

  • The Cambridge History of Iran

    Open Access•C P Melville, Stanley I Grossman et al.•The Cambridge history of Iran.•1991

  • Printing, the Press and Literature in Modern Iran

    Open Access•Peter Avery•The Cambridge history of Iran.•1991

  • A Familial State

    Open Access•Assef Ashraf•International Journal Middle East…•2018

  • Russia and Britain in Persia

    Firuz Kazemzadeh•Russia and Britain in Persia•2013

Unique citing works10
Citations per year0,29
Citation span1991 - 2018 (28)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae