Not the Whole Story
Another Response to John Milbank's Theology and Social Theory Part I
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10306136 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John L Daniels (0000-0002-6975-9934, corresponding author), John Daniels (0000-0002-7598-4660) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue | 962 |
| Pages | 188-196 |
| Publication date | 2001-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Blackfriars (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0028-4289 • E-ISSN: 1741-2005 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1741-2005.2001.tb01755.x |
| OpenAlex | W2127013477 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 13 |
It is the province of knowledge to narrate and the privilege of wisdom to listen. With apologies to Oliver Wendell Holmes It is already ten years since John Milbank published Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason. Its impact was immediately apparent, the journals Modern Theology and New Blackfriars dedicating entire numbers to discussing some of the many issues arising from it. For it is unquestionably a daunting achievement: a relatively simple thesis elaborated at considerable length and taking on in the process a whole range of authors from a variety of disciplines and across history. To do the book justice in a few words is almost impossible; but it surely remains the case that whatever one’s views of Milbank’s conclusions, it is difficult not to respect both the scholarship and ambition which it represents. A number of the many issues raised in the course of the book have already been addressed by subsequent reviewers and authors. It might seem curious that there is still something left to be said fully a decade later; and yet there is so much meat contained in the book that it remains a banquet of inspiration and controversy in many ways. In this paper I wish to focus my engagement with Milbank’s ideas by considering his account of the work of Paul Ricoeur. Although he discusses Ricoeur only very briefly—a few pages (pp. 263-8) out of more than four hundred—I hope to show how dealing with this small part leads us to engage with a central element of Milbank’s thesis. Before embarking in earnest on this task, there are two points which need to be declared
The model of the text
Time and Narrative, Volume 3
Symbol Reality and Society
On Multiple Realities
Whose Justice? Which Rationality?
Not Exactly Politics or Power
Christianity at the End of the Story or the Return of the Master‐narrative
Religion in Essence and Manifestation
Time and Narrative, Volume 1
Bridging the Gap between Understanding and Explanation Approaches to the Study of Religion
| Highly cited | No |
|---|