Could we have experiences as of objects enduring
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10344381 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kristie Miller (0000-0002-5092-8419, The University of Sydney, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/pq/pqaf069 |
| OpenAlex | W4413803902 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 65 |
It is often suggested that we have experiences as of objects enduring. If this is a claim about perceptual experience, it is unclear how it could be true. It seems plausible that however objects persist, we would receive the same inputs to perception. Hence, things would seem experientially the same regardless of whether objects endure, or persist in some other manner. So, it cannot be that in any interesting sense we have experiences as of objects enduring. My aim is the modest one of articulating how, despite this, we could have perceptual experiences as of objects enduring. I then argue that even if we do, it does not give us any reason to infer, on the basis of these experiences, that objects endure
Aesthetics · Epistemology · Action Observation and Synchronization · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Impossible Worlds
The Impossible
I Survival and Identity
Recognition-by-components
The reviewing of object files
Top-down influences on visual processing
A Materialist Metaphysics of the Human Person
Structures and circumstances
Relativity and Persistence
Temporal Parts Unmotivated
Temporal Parts and the Possibility of Change
Orienting of Attention
Impossible Worlds
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |