Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Should We Wish Well to All

Bibliographic Data

ID10344644
AuthorsCaspar Hare (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume125
Issue4
Pages451-472
Publication date2016-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Philosophical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8108 • E-ISSN: 1558-1470
PublisherDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1215/00318108-3624764
OpenAlexW2530034205
LanguageEN
Citations received22
References cited18

Some moral theories (for example, standard, “ex post” forms of egalitarianism, prioritarianism, and constraint-based deontology) tell you, in some situations in which you are interacting with a group of people, to avoid acting in the way that is expectedly best for everybody. This essay argues that such theories are mistaken. Go ahead and do what is expectedly best for everybody. The argument is based on the thought that when interacting with an individual it is fine for you to act in the expected interests of the individual and that many interactions with individuals may compose an interaction with a group

Argument (complex analysis · Consequentialism · Constraint (computer-aided design · Contemporary philosophy · Deontological ethics · Egalitarianism · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Wish · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Mathematics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • Reasons, rationality, and opaque sweetening

    Open Access•Ryan Doody•Noûs•2025

  • The case for comparability

    Open Access•Cian Dorr, Jacob M Nebel et al.•Noûs•2023

  • The procreation asymmetry asymmetry

    Open Access•Adam Lerner•Philosophical Studies•2023

  • Opaque Options

    Open Access•Keith Kowalczyk, Aidan B Penn•Philosophical Studies•2024

  • The procreative asymmetry and the impossibility of elusive permission

    Open Access•Jack Spencer•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • Infinite ethics and the limits of impartiality

    Open Access•Jacob M Nebel•Noûs•2025

  • Ex Ante Pareto and the Opaque-Identity Puzzle

    Johan E Gustafsson, Keith Kowalczyk et al.•The Journal of Philosophy•2026

  • Risks and Weak Aggregation

    Alec Walen, Alec D Walen•Ethics•2020

  • Relevant Claims and Causal Ramifications

    Open Access•Patrick Williamson•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2026

  • Saving Fanaticism

    Open Access•Keith Kowalczyk•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2025

  • On Ex Ante Contractualism

    Open Access•Korbinian Rüger•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2018

  • The Challenge for Coronavirus Vaccine Testing

    Open Access•Bastian Steuwer•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2024

  • Contractualism, Complaints, and Risk

    Open Access•Bastian Steuwer•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2021

  • The Composition of Risk

    Open Access•Vishnu Sridharan•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2025

  • The Sequence Argument Against the Procreation Asymmetry

    Open Access•Matthew Adelstein•Utilitas•2024

  • Getting machines to do your dirty work

    Open Access•Tomi Francis, Todd Karhu•Philosophical Studies•2025

  • Tragedy at Wittenberg

    Open Access•Micha Lazarus•Renaissance Quarterly•2020

  • Save the five

    Open Access•Zach Barnett•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2024

  • Procedural chances and the equality of claims

    Open Access•Vishnu Sridharan•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2021

  • Longtermism and aggregation

    Open Access•Emma Curran•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2025

  • The Moral Evaluation of Repeated Risks

    Open Access•Vishnu Sridharan•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2025

  • Contractualism and Risk

    Open Access•Korbinian Rüger•Philosophy Compass•2025

  • Risk and Rationality

    Lara Buchak, Lara Marie Buchak•Risk and rationality•2013

  • The Trolley Problem

    Judith Jarvis Thomson•The Yale Law Journal•1985

  • Equality and Priority

    Open Access•Derek Parfit•Ratio•1997

  • Prioritarianism and the Measure of Utility

    Open Access•Michael Otsuka•Journal of Political Philosophy•2013

  • Prioritarianism for Prospects

    Open Access•Włodek Rabinowicz•Utilitas•2002

  • Prioritarianism and the Separateness of Persons

    Open Access•Michael Otsuka•Utilitas•2012

  • Another Defence of the Priority View

    Open Access•Derek Parfit•Utilitas•2012

  • Oughts, Options, and Actualism

    Frank Jackson, Robert Pargetter•The Philosophical Review•1986

  • Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility

    John C Harsanyi•Journal of Political Economy•1955

  • The Limits of Kindness

    Caspar Hare•Limits of Kindness•2013

  • Turning the Trolley

    Open Access•Judith Jarvis Thomson•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2008

  • Why It Matters That Some Are Worse Off Than Others

    Open Access•Michael Otsuka, Alex Voorhoeve•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2009

Unique citing works22
Citations per year2,75
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 22

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae