Avowals and First-Person Privilege

When people avow their present feelings, sensations, thoughts, etc., they enjoy what may be called “first-person privilege.” If I now said: “I have a headache,” or “I'm thinking about Venice,” I would be taken at my word: I would normally not be challenged. According to one prominent approach, this privilege is due to a special epistemic access we have to our own present states of mind. On an alternative, deflationary approach the privilege merely reflects a socio-linguistic convention governing avowals. We reject both approaches. On our proposed account, a full explanation of the privilege must recognize avowals as expressive performances, which can be taken to reveal directly the subject's present mental condition. We are able to improve on special access accounts and deflationary accounts, as well as familiar expressive accounts, by explaining both the asymmetries and the continuities between avowals and other pronouncements, and by locating a genuine though non-epistemic source for first-person privilege

Convention · Epistemology · Feeling · Political science · Privilege (computing · Social science · Sociology · Subject (documents · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Psychology · Social Psychology

• Unsettled belief

  Open Access•Bob Beddor•The Philosophical Quarterly•2025

  Add to list

• Solving the inclusion problem

  Open Access•Elizabeth Willems•Synthese•2024

  Add to list