Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Management by Measurement? Public Management Practices Amidst Ambiguity

Dados Bibliográficos

ID10392016
AutoresM Noordegraaf (0000-0002-3445-8568, Utrecht University), Tineke Abma (0000-0002-8902-322X, Maastricht University)
Ano2003
Volume81
Fascículo4
Páginas853-871
Data de publicação2003-11-25
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPublic Administration (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0033-3298 • E-ISSN: 1467-9299
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00374.x
OpenAlexW2139051615
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas61
Referências citadas26

In the public sphere, a management by measurement (MBM) movement can be traced. Practitioners attempt to strengthen the transparency and effectiveness of administrative systems by introducing rational measurement cycles. When issues are managed, ambitions must be stated, options must be assessed, optimal options must be chosen and performance must be monitored and evaluated. This cycle rests upon assumptions that are often untenable. When issues are ambiguous, interpretative spaces exist; when interpretative spaces exist, strict measurement cycles do not work because required conditions and assumptions cannot be met. This article explores the nature of interpretative spaces by identifying three types of public management practice. In this typology of public management, practices differ in terms of the extent to which issues can be classified, as well as the extent to which standards are contested. Management by measurement fits canonical practices where issues are known and standards are shared, it is argued, but is less appropriate for evaluating non‐canonical practices and practices‐in‐transition where such a classification of issues is weak and consensus on standard is absent. MBM focuses on data; the other practices require dialogue in order to manage ambiguity and interpretative spaces

Ambiguity · Business · Economics · Management science · Order (exchange · Political science · Public management · Public relations · Public sphere · Sociology · Transparency (behavior · Typology · Work (physics · Accounting and Organizational Management · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Law · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • Ambiguous Covid-19 Messaging Increases Unsafe Socializing Intentions

    Open Access•Vincent Hopkins, Mark Pickup et al.•Journal of Behavioral Public…•2023

  • The balancing act

    Open Access•Lizet Kuitert•Architecture and the Built…•2021

  • Welfare Administration and Its Reform

    Open Access•Tanja Klenk•The Palgrave Handbook of Public…•2018

  • Working for Policy

    Open Access•T A P Metze, H Colebatch et al.•Working for policy•2010

  • Electronic monitoring, trust, and turnover intention in the public and private sector

    Open Access•Christer A Flatøy, Jonas Lund‐tønnesen et al.•Public Management Review•2025

  • Measuring or meaning? Insights into quality of mental healthcare from patient and therapist stories

    Open Access•L Krikken Mulders•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2026

  • Public sector values

    Open Access•Rachel Gabel‐Shemueli, Rachel Gabel-Shemueli et al.•Cross Cultural Management An…•2013

  • The Evaluation of Complex Infrastructure Projects

    Open Access•Lasse Gerrits, Verweij et al.•Evaluation of Complex Infrastructur…•2018

  • Vol 9 No 1 (2019)

    Open Access•Full Issue•Professions and Professionalism•2019

  • Interdisciplinary Promises and Hierarchical Ambiguities in a Danish Hospital Context

    Open Access•Anette Lykke Hindhede, Vibeke Andersen•Professions and Professionalism•2019

  • The psychology of local officials

    Rui Mu, Martin De Jong•Journal of Chinese Governance•2018

  • Unexpected Advantages of Less Accurate Performance Measurements. How Simple Prescription Data Works in a Complex Setting Regarding the Use of Medications

    Open Access•Antoinette De Bont, Kor Grit•Public Administration•2011

  • Restructuring Weberian Bureaucracy

    Open Access•Elisabetta Gualmini•Public Administration•2007

  • Autonomy and Reregulation

    Open Access•Wouter Van Dooren, Joris Voets et al.•Public Administration•2015

  • What’s Valued Most? Similarities and Differences Between the Organizational Values of the Public and Private Sector

    Open Access•Zeger Van Der Wal, G De Graaf et al.•Public Administration•2008

  • Embracing the ambiguity

    Open Access•Aaron Deslatte, Elizabeth A Koebele et al.•Public Administration•2024

  • Governing Mental Health Care

    Open Access•Tineke Broer, Anna P Nieboer et al.•Public Administration•2011

  • Struggling With Ambiguity

    Open Access•Jarmo Vakkuri•Public Administration•2010

  • The governance of self-organization

    Open Access•José Nederhand, Erik-Hans Klijn et al.•Policy Sciences•2018

  • Understanding clerical decisions in granting social assistance

    Open Access•Luiz Henrique Alonso De Andrade, Elias Pekkola•International Social Security…•2025

  • Neo‐colonialism through measurement

    Open Access•Bill de Maria, Banerjee Banerjee•Critical Perspectives on…•2008

  • Narratives of Promise, Narratives of Caution

    Open Access•Alec Fraser, Stefanie Tan et al.•Social Policy and Administration•2018

  • The role of goal-setting in urban climate governance

    Open Access•Hege Hofstad, Marianne Millstein et al.•Earth System Governance•2020

  • Turning New Public Management theory into reality

    Open Access•Sander Merkus, Marcel Veenswijk•Environment and Planning C…•2017

  • Unraveling Disinformation

    Sebastiaan Rietjen•The International Journal of…•2019

  • Performance is political

    John Harris•Critical and Radical Social Work•2021

  • New public management and the ‘business’ of policing organised crime in Australia

    Open Access•Monique Mann•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2016

  • Modernising government, aestheticising decision information

    Open Access•Oz Gore•Culture and Organization•2023

  • Why is the president of Malawi angry? Towards an ethnography of corruption

    William De Maria•Culture and Organization•2010

  • Ambiguity, bureaucracy and certainty

    Open Access•Ching Leong, Neng Qian•Policy and Society•2016

  • A small wins framework to overcome the evaluation paradox of governing wicked problems

    Open Access•Catrien J A M Termeer, Cjam Termeer et al.•Policy and Society•2018

  • Transfer Agents, Knowledge Authority, and Indices of Regulatory Quality

    Fabrizio De Francesco•Journal of Comparative Policy…•2014

  • Enriching evaluation practice through care ethics

    Open Access•Tineke Abma, Merel Visse et al.•Evaluation•2020

  • The life-cycle approach to performance management

    Open Access•G Jan Van Helden, Åge Johnsen et al.•Evaluation•2012

  • Responsive Evaluation in the Interference Zone Between System and Lifeworld

    Open Access•Tineke Abma, Tineke A Abma et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2016

  • Performance Management for Wicked Problems

    Ida Drury•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2014

  • Reflexive Professionalism as a Second Generation of Evidence-Based Practice

    Open Access•Hans‐Uwe Otto, Hans-Uwe Otto et al.•Research on Social Work Practice•2009

  • The impact of using algorithms for managerial decisions on public employees' procedural justice

    Open Access•Rosanna Nagtegaal•Government Information Quarterly•2020

  • Backloading to extinction

    Open Access•Megan Evans, Megan C Evans•Australian Journal of Public…•2023

  • Untangling the Association Between Goal Clarity and Public Service Motivation With the Moderating Role of Value Congruence

    Open Access•Gook Jin Kim, Namhoon Ki et al.•The American Review of Public…•2023

  • The material practices of quantification

    Open Access•M De Wilde, Thomas Franssen•Critical Social Policy•2016

  • Public Sector Reforms and Financial Transparency

    Stein Kristiansen, Agus Dwiyanto et al.•Contemporary Southeast Asia•2009

  • Public Organizations and Mission Valence

    Open Access•Bradley E Wright, Sanjay K Pandey•Administration & Society•2011

  • Designing Performance Systems in Anticipation of Unintended Consequences

    Open Access•Yi Lü, Elaine Yi Lu et al.•Administration & Society•2021

  • From “Pure” to “Hybrid” Professionalism

    Open Access•M Noordegraaf•Administration & Society•2007

  • On Value Differences Experienced by Sector Switchers

    Open Access•G De Graaf, Zeger Van Der Wal•Administration & Society•2008

  • Staging Science

    Open Access•Wouter Van Dooren, M Noordegraaf•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Of Politics and Purpose

    Open Access•Jung Wook Lee, Hal G Rainey et al.•Public Administration•2009

  • Fragmented but Forceful

    Open Access•M Noordegraaf, Taco Brandsen et al.•Public Administration•2006

  • Responsive regulation in public‐private partnerships

    Open Access•Anne‐marie Reynaers, Salvador Parrado•Regulation & Governance•2017

  • Extending the Theory of Goal Ambiguity to Programs

    Open Access•Chan Su Jung•Public Administration Review•2014

  • Pulling the Levers

    Open Access•Bradley E Wright, Donald P Moynihan et al.•Public Administration Review•2011

  • NPM

    Erik Jansen, E Pieter Jansen•Local Government Studies•2008

  • Optimizing government outsourcing

    Open Access•Harsh Sharma•Journal of Public Policy•2025

  • Developing and Testing a New Goal Taxonomy

    Randall S Davis, Edmund C Stazyk•Journal of Public Administration…•2015

  • Organizational Goal Ambiguity and Job Satisfaction in the Public Sector

    Chan Su Jung•Journal of Public Administration…•2014

  • Why Are Goals Important in the Public Sector? Exploring the Benefits of Goal Clarity for Reducing Turnover Intention

    Chan Su Jung•Journal of Public Administration…•2014

  • University Administrators as Information Tacticians

    Open Access•Tim Gawley•Symbolic Interaction•2008

  • Measuring Corruption

    Open Access•José-Miguel Bello Y Villarino•Social Indicators Research•2021

  • The Bureaucrat, the Businessperson, and Their Perceptions of Each Other's Value Orientation

    Zeger Van Der Wal, G De Graaf•Public Integrity•2007

  • Learning from Afghanistan

    Sebastiaan Rietjen, Joseph Soeters et al.•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2013

  • Order Without Design

    Martha S Feldman, Martha Feldman•Order Without Design•1989

  • The Audit Society

    Michael Power•The audit society•1999

  • Stakeholder Participation and Utilization in Program Evaluation

    Open Access•Jennifer G Greene•Evaluation Review•1988

  • Sensemaking in Organizations

    Dennis A Gioia, Ajay Mehra et al.•Academy of Management Review•1996

  • Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice

    John Seely Brown, Paul Duguid•Organization Science•1991

  • Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research

    Norman K Denzin, Yvonna S Lincoln et al.•SAGE Handbook of Qualitative…•2013

  • Handbook of Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Juan Luis Londoño Fernández•Journal of Environmental Psychology•1994

  • Sorting Things Out

    G C Bowker, Susan Leigh Star•Sorting Things Out•1999

  • Fourth-Generation Evaluation

    Anne Neufeld, Alan Ryan et al.•Canadian Journal of Program…•1988

  • Dialogue on Dialogue

    Open Access•Tineke Abma, Tineke A Abma et al.•Evaluation•2001

  • Opening Thoughts

    Open Access•Tineke Abma, Tineke A Abma•Evaluation•2001

  • Dialogue in Evaluation

    Open Access•Jennifer C Greene•Evaluation•2001

  • A Postscript on Thinking about Dialogue

    Open Access•Thomas A Schwandt•Evaluation•2001

  • The Administrative Behavior of Federal Bureau Chiefs

    Open Access•Barry Bozeman, Herbert Kaufman•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1982

  • Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations

    Charles Perrow, James G March et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1977

  • Social Construction of Reality

    Open Access•Gale Miller, David Nowacek•The Blackwell Encyclopedia of…•2018

  • Fuzziness and Bureaucracy

    Allan W Lerner, John Wanat•Public Administration Review•1983

  • A Public Management for All Seasons

    Open Access•Christopher Hood•Public Administration•1991

  • Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms

    Open Access•Peter A Hall, Rosemary C R Taylor•Political Studies•1996

  • Institutions and Organizations

    P V Marsden, W Richard Scott•Social Forces•1996

Obras citantes distintas61
Citações por ano3,05
Intervalo de citações2006 - 2026 (21)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 59
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae