The Hobbesian Crowd Problem
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10431952 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luc Foisneau (0000-0003-2075-9711, Établissement public Campus Condorcet, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 474-493 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Review of Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034670523000244 |
| OpenAlex | W4385795044 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 8 |
In this article I try to identify the nature of the Hobbesian Crowd Problem as a problem depending on the nature of the connection, or absence of connection, between the notions of “crowd” and “people.” When a crowd is considered as a “subjected crowd” it is but the flip side of a people, which is itself the other name of the sovereign. When considered as a gathering of people, the crowd's status depends on the intention of its members as well as the number of its participants, but also on whether it is authorized by the sovereign. Within the framework of his complex theory of associations (or “system subjects”), Hobbes's theory of crowds is a useful instrument for assessing what we now call “populism,” the claim by some citizens to speak for the whole political community
Computer security · Connection (principal bundle · Crowds · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereignty · Computer Science · Law · Marxism and Critical Theory · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
| Highly cited | No |
|---|