Lessons from Private Financing of Transport Infrastructure Dutch Infrastructure in the 19th Century and European Projects in the 20th Century
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10452235 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter Nijkamp (0000-0002-4068-8132, University of Amsterdam), Sytze A Rienstra (University of Amsterdam) |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 231-246 |
| Publication date | 1997-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revue économique (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0035-2764 • E-ISSN: 1950-6694 |
| Publisher | Sciences Po (PUBLISHER • FR) |
| DOI | 10.3406/reco.1997.409872 |
| OpenAlex | W3124400856, W4390375541, W2165529376 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
In the past decade serious doubts have been expressed on the efficiency of a strong public financial involvement in infrastructure.This provokes the question whether financing of infrastructure should be a task of the government.For this purpose, the paper first presents a concise theoretical overview under which circumstances there is a case for public intervention.Interestingly, the financing and operation of transport infrastructure has not always been the task of the public sector.In the 19th century, the railway infrastructure in Europe was financed and operated by the private sector.Later, the govemment took over more and more responsibilities.This paper analyses then for the Netherlands the reasons for the govemment to take over the financing of infrastructure, in order to draw conclusions for the present and the future.Also in the 20th century many European projects have been privately financed.In the third part of the paper an overview is presented of several projects (e.g., Channel Tunnel, Mont Blanc Tunnel, Dartford Bridge, Dutch tunnels, Storebelt, etc.) as wel1 as an analysis of the circumstances under which these are economically successful and politically feasible.It is concluded that the influence of governments wil1 -and should -remain substantial because of economie, politica1 and environmental reasons.However, (some degree of) private financing is an interesting option for transport infrastructure in various cases.* the ethics and justice argument; an obvious example is the provision of nonprofitable public transport, because the government wants to provide a minimum mobility leve1 for everyone at reasonable fares
Art · Business · Civil engineering · Critical infrastructure · Geography · Humanities · Political science · Regional science · Transport engineering · Transport infrastructure · Urban infrastructure · Urban planning · Engineering · European Monetary and Fiscal Policies · Finance · Global History, Politics, and Ideology · Transport and Economic Policies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|