Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ken Loach

The Politics of Film and Television

Bibliographic Data

ID10495136
AuthorsDavid Archibald (corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume54
Issue3
Pages427-430
Publication date2013-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueScreen (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0036-9543 • E-ISSN: 1460-2474
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/screen/hjt025
OpenAlexW1981410613
LanguageEN

Two main features characterize Ken Loach's film and television output: a commitment to a radical, even revolutionary, political agenda, and formal qualities (descriptions range from ‘naturalist’ or ‘social realist’ to the pejorative ‘kitchen-sink’ or ‘miserabilist’) developed out of a unique filmmaking approach combining linear shooting, the employment of natural lighting and casting nonprofessional actors. John Hill's book-length study of Loach's almost five-decade-long career attempts to synthesize both features and, in the process, provide a contextualized ‘social history’, which assesses ‘the political significance of his work’ (p. 2). It is a formidable task, not least because of the scale of the seventy-seven-year-old, English-born director's oeuvre: the book's filmography lists fifty-eight films and television programmes (one-off plays, miniseries – both individual episodes and entire series – and documentaries).1 It is a task, however, in which Hill is predominantly successful, despite a rather ambiguous and brief conclusion. From the start, Hill flags the importance of collaboration to the director's output, noting that it was producer Tony Garnett who initiated much of their early/mid 1960s television projects, and that screenwriter Jim Allen's Trotskyist outlook heavily influenced Loach's politics when they started working together later that decade. Nevertheless, Hill notes that while Loach rejects the auteur label, ‘the circumstances in which his films are made and shown have increasingly encouraged a reading of his work in precisely these terms’ (p. 5). Hill, however, does not present an auteurist study with an ‘overtly evaluative approach’, opting instead to locate Loach's work within the ‘social, political and artistic currents of the time’ (p. 6). The book is broadly chronological, concentrating on what Hill regards as the director's ‘most important work’ or work which has received ‘less attention than might have been appropriate’ (p. 6). Less consideration is therefore given to Loach's cinematic output than to his television work

Art · Art history · Epistemology · Film director · Filmmaking · Filmography · Media studies · Movie theater · Naturalism · Performance art · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Visual arts · Cinema and Media Studies · Law · Philosophy · Political and Economic history of UK and US

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae