Wittgenstein’s persuasive rhetoric
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10499058 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dinda L Gorlée (1University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 2016 |
| Issue | 208 |
| Pages | 49-77 |
| Publication date | 2015-11-05 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Semiotica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-1998 • E-ISSN: 1613-3692 |
| Publisher | De Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/sem-2015-0121 |
| OpenAlex | W2548211399 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
Wittgenstein surprised with the rhetorical inversion of his style of writing, often at the expense of thought. In his works, he skillfully constructed the fragmentary paragraphs to solve the “confusions” of language. The result of Wittgenstein’s conscious endeavor is the persuasive effect of new reasoning in the “ornamental” type of the philosophical writings about language. Wittgenstein’s verbal genres are the interplay of deduction, induction, and abduction, formed consciously and subconsciously, following the three categories of Peirce’s semio-logical reasoning. Wittgenstein’s rhetoric changed the first certainty of philosophy into the abductive uncertainty of his later works, keeping the story of Wittgenstein’s reasoning in suspense
Certainty · Subconscious · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |