The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993
Implications for Social Work Practice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10552154 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James R Kautz (Georgia Department of Education, corresponding author), F Netting (0000-0002-9898-7418, Virginia Commonwealth University), F E Netting, Ruth Huber (0000-0003-4545-456X, University of Louisville), Kevin Borders (0009-0008-7866-118X, University of Louisville), Taylor Davis (0000-0001-7492-7114, Allegheny County Department of Human Services), T S Davis |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 364-373 |
| Publication date | 1997-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Work (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-8046 • E-ISSN: 1545-6846 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/sw/42.4.364 |
| OpenAlex | W2126285513 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 2 |
The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 1993 sets new directions for the way government conducts its business with regard to all programs. Because Congress intends to base budget decisions on agencies' reports of performance in achieving outcomes, the GPRA will affect the operations of social services programs. This article outlines the intent and content of the GPRA. It frames the act within the context of the current debates over reinventing government, program performance, and outcomes. Finally, it articulates the GPRA's multiple implications for social work practice in human services programs
Affect (linguistics · Business · Context (archaeology · Economic growth · Economics · Government (linguistics · Human services · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Work (physics · Engineering · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Healthcare Policy and Management · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Social Work
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,15 |
| Citation span | 1999 - 2010 (12) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |