Literature as Fetishism
Some Consequences for a Theory of Translation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10607619 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rosemary Arrojo (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 208-216 |
| Publication date | 2002-09-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Meta Journal des traducteurs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0026-0452 • E-ISSN: 1492-1421 |
| Publisher | Consortium Erudit (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.7202/001907ar |
| OpenAlex | W2020629859 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
This article looks at different attempts to define literary and poetic texts and the claim of untranslatability with regard to these. It studies the relationship between author, reader and text and concludes that every act of translation, and reading, implies the innate unpredictability of human relationships constantly driven by the desire to transform all things we create into some form of autobiography
Art · Epistemology · Fetishism · Linguistics · Literature · Poetry · Reading (process) · Sociology · Translation (biology) · Translation studies · Anthropology · Philosophy · Translation Studies and Practices
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |