Justice, Diversity, and The Well-Ordered Society
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 10690634 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Brian Kogelmann (0000-0001-9672-6989, University of Arizona, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2017 |
| Páginas | pqw082 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2017-01-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/pq/pqw082 |
| OpenAlex | W2570438727 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 8 |
| Referencias citadas | 16 |
One unchanging feature of John Rawls’ thought is that we theorize about well-ordered societies. Yet, once we introduce justice pluralism—the fact that reasonable people disagree about the nature and requirements of justice, something Rawls eventually admits is inevitable in liberal societies—then a well-ordered society as Rawls defines it is impossible. This requires we develop new models of society to replace the well-ordered society in order to adequately address such disagreements. To do so, we ought to remain faithful to those reasons Rawls has for introducing the idea of the well-ordered society in the first place. It is shown that two models that resemble closely Rawls’ model of the well-ordered society but are also capable of dealing with justice pluralism do not perform well when judged against such criteria. Yet a new model of the well-ordered society—one that looks radically different from what Rawls originally imagined—does succeed.
Diversity (politics) · Economic Justice · Economics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Just society · Law and economics · Order (exchange) · Pluralism (philosophy) · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics
Polycentric democracy and dynamic political stability
Exit, Voice, and Public Reason
Trust in a Polarized Age
The Supreme Court as the Fountain of Public Reason
Is Justice a Fixed Point
Moral Diversity and Moral Responsibility
Talk May Be Cheap, but Deeds Seldom Cheat
Political Stability in the Open Society
Justice as Fairness
Reply to Alexander and Musgrave
A Theory of Justice
Liberalism without Perfection
The Idea of Public Reason Revisited
Anarchy, State, and Utopia
Justice and the Social Contract
The Independence of Moral Theory
Co-Production, Polycentricity, and Value Heterogeneity
The Tyranny of the Ideal
The Liberal Archipelago
Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory
Justice as fairness
The Idea of Public Reason Revisited
The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2018 - 2025 (8) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 6 |