Perception and Action
The Taste Test
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10691274 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard Gray (0000-0001-9694-4206), Alessandra Tanesini (0000-0002-6250-471X, Cardiff University) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue | 241 |
| Pages | 718-734 |
| Publication date | 2010-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.651.x |
| OpenAlex | W1874587661 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Traditional accounts of perception endorse an input–output model: perception is the input from world to mind and action is the output from mind to world. In contrast, enactive accounts propose action to be constitutive of perception. We focus on Noë's sensorimotor version of enactivism, with the aim of clarifying the proper limits of enactivism more generally. Having explained Noë's particular version of enactivism, which accounts for the contents of perceptual experience in terms of sensorimotor knowledge, we use taste as a test for his central thesis. We conclude that taste and other similar senses do not display the central features which Noë claims apply to all perceptual experience
Action (physics) · Autopoiesis · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Contrast (vision) · Enactivism · Epistemology · Focus (optics) · Perception · Taste · Action Observation and Synchronization · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Neuroscience · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,25 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2021 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |