Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Better Never to Have Been

The Harm of Coming into Existence – David Benatar

Bibliographic Data

ID10692224
AuthorsSaul Smilansky (0000-0001-7503-7607, University of Haifa, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume58
Issue232
Pages569-571
Publication date2008-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.572_10.x
OpenAlexW2087869733
LanguageEN
Citations received2

Many philosophers tend to think that a good philosophy book should give a balanced account of the relevant issues, and elucidate and explicate people's intuitions on the topic with which it deals. But many significant philosophical contributions have not been anything like that: on the contrary, they have gone to extremes in a single direction, showing us how far a philosophical imagination can advance into the unknown, and unveiling the unexpected things we find once we get there. David Benatar's challenging book is of the second type. Readers who let go of their scepticism and are willing to come along for the ride will, at the very least, enjoy a fascinating and unusual philosophical journey. The structure of the book is straightforward and clear. In ch. 2 Benatar argues on conceptual grounds that coming into existence is always a harm. In ch. 3 he argues that every life, even the best, is very bad. Given those conclusions, the rest of the book is a systematic and often ingenious spelling out of the implications. In ch. 4 he argues for a moral duty of ‘anti‐natalism’, namely, the duty not to have children. In ch. 5 he urges that we should take a ‘pro‐death’ view of abortion, so that (given plausible assumptions about when persons come to exist in a morally significant way), whenever a woman becomes pregnant, abortion in the early months of pregnancy should be the default position. Ch. 6 makes the case for the claim that the ideal human population is zero, and that human extinction is to be welcomed (if, perhaps, gradually rather than all at once). The concluding chapter tries to counter the anticipated intuition that such views must be wrong, and to show how, once one already exists, death can be bad (and suicide not inevitable), even though it is always bad to have come into existence

Abortion · Duty · Epistemology · Harm · Philosophical methodology · Population · Pregnancy · Skepticism · Sociology · Theology · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Theology and Philosophy of Evil

  • Better Never to Have Been

    Open Access•Joseph Packer•philoSOPHIA•2010

  • Wailing from the heights of velleity

    Jeroen Robbert Zandbergen•South African Journal of Philosophy•2021

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,13
Citation span2010 - 2021 (12)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae