Three Methods of Ethics

A Debate

Bibliographic Data

ID10693640
AuthorsRobert Shaver (0000-0002-3450-5168, corresponding author)
Year2000
Volume109
Issue1
Pages125-128
Publication date2000-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Philosophical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8108 • E-ISSN: 1558-1470
PublisherDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1215/00318108-109-1-125
OpenAlexW647710735
LanguageEN
Citations received13

Book Review| January 01 2000 Three Methods of Ethics: A Debate THREE METHODS OF ETHICS: A DEBATE. By Marcia W. Baron, Philip Pettit, and Michael Slote. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997. Pp. vi, 285. Robert Shaver Robert Shaver Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2000) 109 (1): 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-109-1-125 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Robert Shaver; Three Methods of Ethics: A Debate. The Philosophical Review 1 January 2000; 109 (1): 125–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-109-1-125 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsThe Philosophical Review Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Cornell University2000 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content

Analytic philosophy · Contemporary philosophy · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · General interest · Political science · Ethics in medical practice · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub